中华皮肤科杂志
中華皮膚科雜誌
중화피부과잡지
Chinese Journal of Dermatology
2013年
9期
661-664
,共4页
尚淑贤%吴晓初%颜艳%林敏乐%苏晓萌%蒋黎%马霞%严桂兰
尚淑賢%吳曉初%顏豔%林敏樂%囌曉萌%蔣黎%馬霞%嚴桂蘭
상숙현%오효초%안염%림민악%소효맹%장려%마하%엄계란
目的 探讨中华皮肤科杂志(简称中皮)和国际皮肤性病学杂志(简称国皮)读者(作者)的分布、阅读习惯和需求以及投稿取向.方法 设计调查问卷,借助两刊网站进行在线调查,通过随刊发行等进行纸质问卷调查.调查内容包括基本情况、订阅情况、期刊网站、投稿情况和评价情况等.结果 收回网络问卷647份,纸质问卷104份,共计751份.中皮和国皮的答题者均以31 ～ 40岁居多(41.82％和42.92％),中级职称为主(35.34％和33.82％).中皮61.24％和国皮58.00％的答题者通过集体订阅纸质版阅读杂志；中皮43.51％和国皮49.67％的答题者倾向于阅读电子版.答题者中,63.50％认为审稿质量和周期影响投稿时对期刊的选择,63.20％则认为是影响因子.最受喜爱的前3个栏目在中皮是论著(50.43％)、病例报告(40.33％)、临床经验(39.93％),在国皮是综述(45.08％)、论著(44.04％)、病例报告(39.90％).结论 中皮和国皮的读者(作者)以中级职称者为主；接近一半的读者倾向于阅读电子版杂志；审稿质量、刊出周期和影响因子可能是作者投稿时最关心的问题.
目的 探討中華皮膚科雜誌(簡稱中皮)和國際皮膚性病學雜誌(簡稱國皮)讀者(作者)的分佈、閱讀習慣和需求以及投稿取嚮.方法 設計調查問捲,藉助兩刊網站進行在線調查,通過隨刊髮行等進行紙質問捲調查.調查內容包括基本情況、訂閱情況、期刊網站、投稿情況和評價情況等.結果 收迴網絡問捲647份,紙質問捲104份,共計751份.中皮和國皮的答題者均以31 ～ 40歲居多(41.82％和42.92％),中級職稱為主(35.34％和33.82％).中皮61.24％和國皮58.00％的答題者通過集體訂閱紙質版閱讀雜誌；中皮43.51％和國皮49.67％的答題者傾嚮于閱讀電子版.答題者中,63.50％認為審稿質量和週期影響投稿時對期刊的選擇,63.20％則認為是影響因子.最受喜愛的前3箇欄目在中皮是論著(50.43％)、病例報告(40.33％)、臨床經驗(39.93％),在國皮是綜述(45.08％)、論著(44.04％)、病例報告(39.90％).結論 中皮和國皮的讀者(作者)以中級職稱者為主；接近一半的讀者傾嚮于閱讀電子版雜誌；審稿質量、刊齣週期和影響因子可能是作者投稿時最關心的問題.
목적 탐토중화피부과잡지(간칭중피)화국제피부성병학잡지(간칭국피)독자(작자)적분포、열독습관화수구이급투고취향.방법 설계조사문권,차조량간망참진행재선조사,통과수간발행등진행지질문권조사.조사내용포괄기본정황、정열정황、기간망참、투고정황화평개정황등.결과 수회망락문권647빈,지질문권104빈,공계751빈.중피화국피적답제자균이31 ～ 40세거다(41.82％화42.92％),중급직칭위주(35.34％화33.82％).중피61.24％화국피58.00％적답제자통과집체정열지질판열독잡지；중피43.51％화국피49.67％적답제자경향우열독전자판.답제자중,63.50％인위심고질량화주기영향투고시대기간적선택,63.20％칙인위시영향인자.최수희애적전3개란목재중피시론저(50.43％)、병례보고(40.33％)、림상경험(39.93％),재국피시종술(45.08％)、론저(44.04％)、병례보고(39.90％).결론 중피화국피적독자(작자)이중급직칭자위주；접근일반적독자경향우열독전자판잡지；심고질량、간출주기화영향인자가능시작자투고시최관심적문제.
Objective To learn the distribution of,reading habits and demands of,as well as considerations for the selection of journals during manuscript submission in,readers/authors of Chinese Journal of Dermatology (CJD) and International Journal of Dermatology and Venereology (IJDV) through a questionnaire survey.Methods A questionnaire was designed,which contained a series of questions concerning general information of journals,journal subscription,jouranl's website,journal selection during manuscript submission,evaluation of journals,etc.To collect data,the electronic version of the questionnaire was placed on the website of both journals from May to October in 2012,and the print version of the questionnaire was delivered to subscribers of both journals by post in May 2012.Results A total of 751 completed questionnaires were obtained,including 647 electronic and 104 printed questionnaires.Most responders had a middle professional title (35.34％ for CJD and 33.82％ for IJDV),and were aged between 31 and 40 years (41.82％ for CJD and 42.92％ for IJDV).More than half of the responders (61.24％ for CJD and 58.55％ for IJDV) read the journals through institutional subscription of print journals.In the case of reading preference,43.51％ of responders of CJD and 49.67％ of those of IJDV selected electronic journals.For journal selection during manuscript submission,the responders mainly considered the quality of and median length of time required for manuscript review (63.50％),followed by impact factor (63.20％).The three most preferred publication types were original article (50.43％),case report (40.33％)and clinical experience (39.93％) for CJD,review (45.08％),original article (44.04％) and case report (39.90％) for IJDV.Conclusions This survey suggests that the readers/authors of CJD and IJDV are predominated by individuals with a middle professional title; nearly half of the readers prefer reading electronic journals.The quality of and median length of time required for manuscript review,as well as impact factor appear to be the three most common factors considered for the selection of journals during manuscript submission.
