电子测试
電子測試
전자측시
ELECTRONIC TEST
2013年
20期
70-72
,共3页
无线mesh网络%多射频多信道%802.11s%路由判据%NS-2
無線mesh網絡%多射頻多信道%802.11s%路由判據%NS-2
무선mesh망락%다사빈다신도%802.11s%로유판거%NS-2
Wireless Mesh Network%Multi-radio and Multi-channel%802.11s%Routing metric%NS-2
无线mesh网络是下一代无线网络技术中人们研究与关注的热点技术之一。根据最新IEEE 802.11s协议,其路由判据是基于无线感知的空时链路判据(airtime link metric,ALM)。这种路由判据比传统的以跳数作为判据要好,但是当多信道或多射频条件下时,这种判据会引起信道容量的衰减,不足以满足如今的网络需求。因此,有许多新的路由判据被提出。例如,加权累计期望传输时间,干扰及信道切换,归一化的瓶颈链路容量等。本文主要定性的比较这些判据的特点,然后通过NS-2进行网络仿真,根据IEEE 802.11s协议中默认的路由协议,将这些多信道条件下的路由判据进行相互比较。由此,得出结论,明确各种路由判据所适用的不同的场合。
無線mesh網絡是下一代無線網絡技術中人們研究與關註的熱點技術之一。根據最新IEEE 802.11s協議,其路由判據是基于無線感知的空時鏈路判據(airtime link metric,ALM)。這種路由判據比傳統的以跳數作為判據要好,但是噹多信道或多射頻條件下時,這種判據會引起信道容量的衰減,不足以滿足如今的網絡需求。因此,有許多新的路由判據被提齣。例如,加權纍計期望傳輸時間,榦擾及信道切換,歸一化的瓶頸鏈路容量等。本文主要定性的比較這些判據的特點,然後通過NS-2進行網絡倣真,根據IEEE 802.11s協議中默認的路由協議,將這些多信道條件下的路由判據進行相互比較。由此,得齣結論,明確各種路由判據所適用的不同的場閤。
무선mesh망락시하일대무선망락기술중인문연구여관주적열점기술지일。근거최신IEEE 802.11s협의,기로유판거시기우무선감지적공시련로판거(airtime link metric,ALM)。저충로유판거비전통적이도수작위판거요호,단시당다신도혹다사빈조건하시,저충판거회인기신도용량적쇠감,불족이만족여금적망락수구。인차,유허다신적로유판거피제출。례여,가권루계기망전수시간,간우급신도절환,귀일화적병경련로용량등。본문주요정성적비교저사판거적특점,연후통과NS-2진행망락방진,근거IEEE 802.11s협의중묵인적로유협의,장저사다신도조건하적로유판거진행상호비교。유차,득출결론,명학각충로유판거소괄용적불동적장합。
The wireless mesh network (WMN) is one of the technologies of the next generation of wireless network technology.According to the latest draft 802.11s,The routing metric is based on the radio-aware airtime link metric(ALM).This metric is much better than the hop-count metric.However,this metric may cause the attenuation of the link capacity when multi-channel or multi-radio conditions are used.In order to increase the capacity of the network,the new metrics had been proposed.Such as weighted cumulative expected transmission time,metric of interference and channel switching,and normalized bottlenecklink capacity.In this paper,we provide a qualitative comparison study that considers the characteristics of these metrics.According to IEEE802.11s,we evaluate the performance of these metrics though the simulation by NS-2.In the end,we can make a conclusion that the appropriate use case of each metric.