CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较胆道镜微创保胆取石术和胆囊切除术对胆囊结石治疗的疗效。方法选取在2009年1月至2012年12月阶段，医院78例胆囊结石患者，在手术之前由B超和CT将病情确诊。根据不同的手术方式，对照组接受胆囊切除术，观察组的患者接受胆道镜的微创保胆术。比较患者的手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量以及住院天数和术后并发症等一系列指标。结果观察组的住院时间、术中出血量、切口长度以及手术时间等各项指标都比对照组要好。结论胆道镜微创保胆取石术治疗效果良好，有更高的安全性、更强的有效性，是一种对患者生存质量能够显著提高的手术方式，值得临床上广泛推广。
목적：비교담도경미창보담취석술화담낭절제술대담낭결석치료적료효。방법선취재2009년1월지2012년12월계단，의원78례담낭결석환자，재수술지전유B초화CT장병정학진。근거불동적수술방식，대조조접수담낭절제술，관찰조적환자접수담도경적미창보담술。비교환자적수술시간、절구장도、술중출혈량이급주원천수화술후병발증등일계렬지표。결과관찰조적주원시간、술중출혈량、절구장도이급수술시간등각항지표도비대조조요호。결론담도경미창보담취석술치료효과량호，유경고적안전성、경강적유효성，시일충대환자생존질량능구현저제고적수술방식，치득림상상엄범추엄。
Objective?To compare the choledochoscope microinvasive gallbladder-protected lithotomy and cholecystectomy for gallstone treatment. Method From January 2010 to December 2012 selection method, 78 patients with gallstone were admitted, diagnosed by CT and B ultrasound of the disease. According to the different operation mode, will undergo cholecystectomy as control group, treated with minimally invasive biliary endoscope gall-preserving patients as the observation group. The amount of hemorrhage in operation time, incision length. Results The bleeding in the observation group hospitalization time, incision length, operation time and amount of a series of indicators are better than the control group. Conclusion choledochoscope microinvasive gallbladder-protected lithotomy is stronger, the effectiveness of higher safety, life quality of patients with operation mode significantly, and has good therapeutic effect, is worthy of popularization in clinical.