CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨不同间隔时间电针治疗缺血性中风的疗效。方法：150例患者随机分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ及Ⅲ组各50例，三组均选取相同穴位进行电针治疗，Ⅰ组隔天1次，Ⅱ组每天1次，Ⅲ组每天2次，对比三组疗效及治疗前后神经功能缺损、Barthel指数和功能独立测定。结果：三组患者临床疗效组间比较均无显著性差异（P>0.05）；治疗后三组神经功能缺损、Barthel指数和功能独立评分比较均显著优于治疗前（P<0.05），但治疗后三组组间比较均无显著性差异（P>0.05）。结论：不同间隔时间电针治疗缺血性中风疗效相近。
목적：탐토불동간격시간전침치료결혈성중풍적료효。방법：150례환자수궤분위Ⅰ、Ⅱ급Ⅲ조각50례，삼조균선취상동혈위진행전침치료，Ⅰ조격천1차，Ⅱ조매천1차，Ⅲ조매천2차，대비삼조료효급치료전후신경공능결손、Barthel지수화공능독립측정。결과：삼조환자림상료효조간비교균무현저성차이（P>0.05）；치료후삼조신경공능결손、Barthel지수화공능독립평분비교균현저우우치료전（P<0.05），단치료후삼조조간비교균무현저성차이（P>0.05）。결론：불동간격시간전침치료결혈성중풍료효상근。
Objective:To study the efficacy in electro-acupuncture treating ischemic stroke of different intervals. Methods:150 patients were random-ly divided into group I, II and III with 50 cases of each, three groups were all treated with electro-acupuncture of same acupoints, group I was quaque die alterna, group II was1 time a day, groupⅢwas 2 times a day, the neurologic impairment, Barthel index and functional independence measure of three groups before and after treatment were compared. Results: There was no significant difference in clinical efficacy between the two groups among patients of the three groups (P>0.05); scores of neurologic impairment, Barthel index and functional independence measure of the three groups after treatment were more significantly superior to those before treatment (P<0.05), but without significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion:The efficacy of electro-acupuncture treating ischemic stroke at different intervals is similar.