中南大学学报(社会科学版)
中南大學學報(社會科學版)
중남대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE)
2014年
2期
261-266
,共6页
“论”%语法化%句法环境%语义演变%临界频率
“論”%語法化%句法環境%語義縯變%臨界頻率
“론”%어법화%구법배경%어의연변%림계빈솔
Lun(论)%grammaticalization%syntactic conditions%semantic evolution%critical frequency
现代汉语介词“论”来源于先秦动词“论”。动词“论”在先秦时期用在连动结构中,两汉时期“论”所在的连动结构主次动词分化明显,唐代“论”由动词引申出介词用法,宋代以后“论”的介词用法进一步扩展。连动结构是引发动词“论”语法化的句法环境,连动结构的句法环境加之连动结构中连词使用频率的递减趋势为动词“论”的语法化提供了条件。“论”由表示“议论、评论”的实词义到表示“以某种单位为准”的语法义的语法化过程中间经历了“衡量、评定”义的语义演变阶段。频率中“临界频率”的增加也是推动“论”语法化的一个重要因素。“论”的句法功能变化的机制是重新分析,而“论”发生语义演变致使语法意义产生的机制是语用推理。
現代漢語介詞“論”來源于先秦動詞“論”。動詞“論”在先秦時期用在連動結構中,兩漢時期“論”所在的連動結構主次動詞分化明顯,唐代“論”由動詞引申齣介詞用法,宋代以後“論”的介詞用法進一步擴展。連動結構是引髮動詞“論”語法化的句法環境,連動結構的句法環境加之連動結構中連詞使用頻率的遞減趨勢為動詞“論”的語法化提供瞭條件。“論”由錶示“議論、評論”的實詞義到錶示“以某種單位為準”的語法義的語法化過程中間經歷瞭“衡量、評定”義的語義縯變階段。頻率中“臨界頻率”的增加也是推動“論”語法化的一箇重要因素。“論”的句法功能變化的機製是重新分析,而“論”髮生語義縯變緻使語法意義產生的機製是語用推理。
현대한어개사“론”래원우선진동사“론”。동사“론”재선진시기용재련동결구중,량한시기“론”소재적련동결구주차동사분화명현,당대“론”유동사인신출개사용법,송대이후“론”적개사용법진일보확전。련동결구시인발동사“론”어법화적구법배경,련동결구적구법배경가지련동결구중련사사용빈솔적체감추세위동사“론”적어법화제공료조건。“론”유표시“의론、평론”적실사의도표시“이모충단위위준”적어법의적어법화과정중간경력료“형량、평정”의적어의연변계단。빈솔중“림계빈솔”적증가야시추동“론”어법화적일개중요인소。“론”적구법공능변화적궤제시중신분석,이“론”발생어의연변치사어법의의산생적궤제시어용추리。
The verb Lun (论) was used in serial verb construction in Pre-Qin Period;and the serial verb construction containing Lun (论) underwent the differentiation of the major and minor verbs in Han Dynasty. Then, the verb Lun (论) developed the prepositional function in Tang Dynasty; after the Song Dynasty the prepositional function of Lun (论)enlarged. Serial verb construction served as the syntactic conditions and, together with the reduction of conjunction usage, it contributed to the grammaticalization of Lun (论). Originally as a notional word with the meaning“discuss”or“comment”, Lun (论) became the functional word which means “following some standards”, through a mediating semantic stage meaning “measure” or “evaluate”. The increase of critical frequency was also a major cause for its grammaticalization. The mechanism of changing its syntactic function was to make a reanalysis, and the mechanism of semantic evolution was pragmatic inference.