湖南大学学报(社会科学版)
湖南大學學報(社會科學版)
호남대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF HUNAN UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2014年
3期
109-114
,共6页
清华简%《尹诰》%《礼记·缁衣》%辨伪
清華簡%《尹誥》%《禮記·緇衣》%辨偽
청화간%《윤고》%《례기·치의》%변위
Tsinghua Bamboo Slips%Yingao%Liji·Ziyi%discrimination
对清华简《尹诰》提出五项质疑:(一)与传世本《礼记·缁衣》所引《尹诰》文义不合太甚;(二)称呼混乱;(三)叙事内容与《尚书·汤誓》互相冲突;(四)“金玉”连用不应出于夏商之际;(五)与传世文献多有雷同,且夹杂后世语言。
對清華簡《尹誥》提齣五項質疑:(一)與傳世本《禮記·緇衣》所引《尹誥》文義不閤太甚;(二)稱呼混亂;(三)敘事內容與《尚書·湯誓》互相遲突;(四)“金玉”連用不應齣于夏商之際;(五)與傳世文獻多有雷同,且夾雜後世語言。
대청화간《윤고》제출오항질의:(일)여전세본《례기·치의》소인《윤고》문의불합태심;(이)칭호혼란;(삼)서사내용여《상서·탕서》호상충돌;(사)“금옥”련용불응출우하상지제;(오)여전세문헌다유뢰동,차협잡후세어언。
Five inaccuracies in the articleYingao on Tsinghua Bamboo Slips are discussed in this paper:1 .on the content of yinao there’s a wide difference between the classic work Liji·Ziyi and the article on the bamboo.2.Appellation disorders.3.Conflict of narrative content with shangshu· Tangshi.4.Lexi-cal mistake of “gold”and “j ade”collocation in ancient Chinese,which is not supposed to appear in the rel-ics of Xia and Shang dynasties.5 .Too many similarities with classic works are found in the article and mingled with later languages.