中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2013年
25期
5-7
,共3页
马传栋%严伟国%丁涵之%全红%韩晶
馬傳棟%嚴偉國%丁涵之%全紅%韓晶
마전동%엄위국%정함지%전홍%한정
局部晚期乳腺癌%老年%新辅助化疗
跼部晚期乳腺癌%老年%新輔助化療
국부만기유선암%노년%신보조화료
Locally advanced breast cancer%Elderly%Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
目的老年乳腺癌患者具有伴随疾病多,化疗耐受性相对较差等特点,本研究旨在分析新辅助化疗在老年局部晚期乳腺癌中的疗效。方法收集2004年1月至2011年12月经细胞学或组织学证实的老年局部晚期乳腺癌29例。全部患者接受术前2~6个周期的新辅助化疗。化疗方案分别为:CMF(环磷酰胺,甲氨蝶呤,氟尿嘧啶),CEF(环磷酰胺,表柔比星,氟尿嘧啶),TE(多西他赛,表柔比星)。化疗后按照实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST 1.1)评价近期疗效。不良反应按照WHO抗肿瘤药物毒性反应分级标准分为0~Ⅳ级。采用电话和信件的方式进行随访。结果29例患者中,CR 2例(6.9%),PR 19例(65.5%),SD 6例(20.7%),PD 2例(6.9%),总有效率(CR+PR)为72.4%(21/29)。本组中无严重心脏毒性反应,无副反应导致的死亡事件发生。术后随访12至84个月,随访率为93.1%。3年总生存率为51.3%。结论新辅助化疗在某些老年局部晚期乳腺癌患者中可能是安全而有效的。
目的老年乳腺癌患者具有伴隨疾病多,化療耐受性相對較差等特點,本研究旨在分析新輔助化療在老年跼部晚期乳腺癌中的療效。方法收集2004年1月至2011年12月經細胞學或組織學證實的老年跼部晚期乳腺癌29例。全部患者接受術前2~6箇週期的新輔助化療。化療方案分彆為:CMF(環燐酰胺,甲氨蝶呤,氟尿嘧啶),CEF(環燐酰胺,錶柔比星,氟尿嘧啶),TE(多西他賽,錶柔比星)。化療後按照實體瘤療效評價標準(RECIST 1.1)評價近期療效。不良反應按照WHO抗腫瘤藥物毒性反應分級標準分為0~Ⅳ級。採用電話和信件的方式進行隨訪。結果29例患者中,CR 2例(6.9%),PR 19例(65.5%),SD 6例(20.7%),PD 2例(6.9%),總有效率(CR+PR)為72.4%(21/29)。本組中無嚴重心髒毒性反應,無副反應導緻的死亡事件髮生。術後隨訪12至84箇月,隨訪率為93.1%。3年總生存率為51.3%。結論新輔助化療在某些老年跼部晚期乳腺癌患者中可能是安全而有效的。
목적노년유선암환자구유반수질병다,화료내수성상대교차등특점,본연구지재분석신보조화료재노년국부만기유선암중적료효。방법수집2004년1월지2011년12월경세포학혹조직학증실적노년국부만기유선암29례。전부환자접수술전2~6개주기적신보조화료。화료방안분별위:CMF(배린선알,갑안접령,불뇨밀정),CEF(배린선알,표유비성,불뇨밀정),TE(다서타새,표유비성)。화료후안조실체류료효평개표준(RECIST 1.1)평개근기료효。불량반응안조WHO항종류약물독성반응분급표준분위0~Ⅳ급。채용전화화신건적방식진행수방。결과29례환자중,CR 2례(6.9%),PR 19례(65.5%),SD 6례(20.7%),PD 2례(6.9%),총유효솔(CR+PR)위72.4%(21/29)。본조중무엄중심장독성반응,무부반응도치적사망사건발생。술후수방12지84개월,수방솔위93.1%。3년총생존솔위51.3%。결론신보조화료재모사노년국부만기유선암환자중가능시안전이유효적。
Objective There are more comorbidity in elderly patients with breast cancer who are poorly tolerable to chemotherapy. The goal of this study is to analyze the clinical efifcacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the elderly patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Methods From January 2004 to December 2011, 29 patients with LABC diagnosed by cytological or histological pathology were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy operatively. The patients were treated for 2-6 cycles of different regimens, including CMF(CTX, MTX, 5-Fu);CEF(CTX, EPI, 5-Fu);TE(Doc, EPI). Chemotherapy response was evaluated by RECIST 1.1 and the toxicity was estimated by WHO evaluation standard. The way of follow-up was telephone or letter. Results 29 patients, there was CR in 2 cases (6.9%), PR in 19 cases (65.5%), SD in 6 cases (20.7%), PD in 2 cases (6.9%);and the overall response rate (CR+PR) was 72.4% There were no severe cardiotoxicity and chemotherapy related death. The duration of follow-up was from 12 months to 84 months, and the rate of follow-up was 93.1%. The overall survival rate of three years was 51.3%. Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in some elderly patients with LABC may be safe and effective.