中外医学研究
中外醫學研究
중외의학연구
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
2013年
29期
14-15
,共2页
持续负压引流%治疗矛盾%开放性气胸%胸壁感染性伤口%皮下气肿
持續負壓引流%治療矛盾%開放性氣胸%胸壁感染性傷口%皮下氣腫
지속부압인류%치료모순%개방성기흉%흉벽감염성상구%피하기종
Continuous negative pressure drainage%Therapeutic paradox%Open pneumothorax%Infectious thoracic wal wound%Subcutaneous emphysema
目的：总结持续负压引流治疗存在治疗矛盾的开放气胸并感染性伤口的临床疗效。方法：回顾性分析存在治疗矛盾的开放气胸并感染性伤口80例患者的临床资料，分别采用持续负压引流和常规开放换药治疗，各40例，比较两组切口清洁时间、皮下气肿治愈时间、换药总数、愈合时间。结果：持续负压引流组切口清洁时间、皮下气肿治愈时间、换药次数、愈合时间均少于常规开放换药组(P<0.05)。结论：持续负压引流治疗存在治疗矛盾的开放气胸并感染性伤口愈合快、疗效显著，住院时间短、降低了住院费用，建议存在治疗矛盾的开放气胸并感染性伤口优先选用持续负压引流治疗。
目的：總結持續負壓引流治療存在治療矛盾的開放氣胸併感染性傷口的臨床療效。方法：迴顧性分析存在治療矛盾的開放氣胸併感染性傷口80例患者的臨床資料，分彆採用持續負壓引流和常規開放換藥治療，各40例，比較兩組切口清潔時間、皮下氣腫治愈時間、換藥總數、愈閤時間。結果：持續負壓引流組切口清潔時間、皮下氣腫治愈時間、換藥次數、愈閤時間均少于常規開放換藥組(P<0.05)。結論：持續負壓引流治療存在治療矛盾的開放氣胸併感染性傷口愈閤快、療效顯著，住院時間短、降低瞭住院費用，建議存在治療矛盾的開放氣胸併感染性傷口優先選用持續負壓引流治療。
목적：총결지속부압인류치료존재치료모순적개방기흉병감염성상구적림상료효。방법：회고성분석존재치료모순적개방기흉병감염성상구80례환자적림상자료，분별채용지속부압인류화상규개방환약치료，각40례，비교량조절구청길시간、피하기종치유시간、환약총수、유합시간。결과：지속부압인류조절구청길시간、피하기종치유시간、환약차수、유합시간균소우상규개방환약조(P<0.05)。결론：지속부압인류치료존재치료모순적개방기흉병감염성상구유합쾌、료효현저，주원시간단、강저료주원비용，건의존재치료모순적개방기흉병감염성상구우선선용지속부압인류치료。
Objective:To summarize the clinical curative effect with the strategy of continuous negative pressure drainage in the treatment of open pneumothorax and infectious wound with therapeutic paradox.Method:Retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 80 patients with open pneumothorax and infectious wound with therapeutic paradox.According to two different treatment strategies,all the 80 patients were randomly divided into two groups of cuts,namely Group One (n=40) and Group Two(n=40),while continuous negative pressure drainage strategy was used for patients in Group One,and conventional open dressing change strategy was adopted for patients in Group Two. Cleaning time,cure time of subcutaneous emphysema,total number of dressing changes,and healing time of the wound were compared between the two groups.Result:Group One took less time than Group Two in terms of cleaning time,cure time of subcutaneous emphysema, and healing time of the wound,and total number of dressing changes of Group one was less than that of Group Two(P<0.05).Conclusion:The treatment strategy of continuous negative pressure drainage is evidently effective in the treatment of open pneumothorax and infectious wound with therapeutic paradox with less healing time,shortened hospitalization time and reduced hospitalization expenses.Therefore,it is suggested that the treatment method of continuous negative pressure drainage is considered as the first therapeutic choice for open pneumothorax and infectious wound with therapeutic paradox.
