中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2013年
29期
120-121
,共2页
消化道穿孔%腹腔镜修补术%开腹手术%效果对比
消化道穿孔%腹腔鏡脩補術%開腹手術%效果對比
소화도천공%복강경수보술%개복수술%효과대비
Gastrointestinal perforation%Laparoscopic repair%Open operation%Effect of contrast
目的:对比分析治疗消化道穿孔时采用腹腔镜修补术与开腹手术的临床效果,寻求最佳治疗方案。方法:选取本院治疗的100例消化道穿孔病例,按照手术方式分为治疗组51例和对照组49例,治疗组实施腹腔镜修补术,对照组实施开腹手术,比较分析两组患者各观察指标的差异。结果:所有手术均获成功,治疗组在术中出血量、术后镇痛例数、术后肠蠕动平均恢复时间、术后并发症例数、术后平均住院时间等方面均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。而两组在平均手术时间上比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在消化道穿孔治疗中的腹腔镜修补术是一种安全有效的微创手术,具有手术创伤小、术后恢复快、治疗费用低等优点,值得在临床推广。
目的:對比分析治療消化道穿孔時採用腹腔鏡脩補術與開腹手術的臨床效果,尋求最佳治療方案。方法:選取本院治療的100例消化道穿孔病例,按照手術方式分為治療組51例和對照組49例,治療組實施腹腔鏡脩補術,對照組實施開腹手術,比較分析兩組患者各觀察指標的差異。結果:所有手術均穫成功,治療組在術中齣血量、術後鎮痛例數、術後腸蠕動平均恢複時間、術後併髮癥例數、術後平均住院時間等方麵均優于對照組,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。而兩組在平均手術時間上比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論:在消化道穿孔治療中的腹腔鏡脩補術是一種安全有效的微創手術,具有手術創傷小、術後恢複快、治療費用低等優點,值得在臨床推廣。
목적:대비분석치료소화도천공시채용복강경수보술여개복수술적림상효과,심구최가치료방안。방법:선취본원치료적100례소화도천공병례,안조수술방식분위치료조51례화대조조49례,치료조실시복강경수보술,대조조실시개복수술,비교분석량조환자각관찰지표적차이。결과:소유수술균획성공,치료조재술중출혈량、술후진통례수、술후장연동평균회복시간、술후병발증례수、술후평균주원시간등방면균우우대조조,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。이량조재평균수술시간상비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론:재소화도천공치료중적복강경수보술시일충안전유효적미창수술,구유수술창상소、술후회복쾌、치료비용저등우점,치득재림상추엄。
Objective:To explore the clinical effect of laparoscopic repair and open surgery in the treatment of gastrointestinal perforation,and seek the best treatment plan.Method:One hundred patients with gastrointestinal perforation were selected in our hospital,they were divided into the treatment group for 51 cases and the control group for 49 cases according to the operation method.The treatment group was given laparoscopic repair,the control group was given laparotomy operation,the differences between two groups of patients in the observation of the index were compared.Result:All the operation were successful,the treatment group in the intraoperative bleeding volume,postoperative analgesia,the number of cases of intestinal peristalsis,the average recovery time of postoperative complication cases,the average postoperative hospital stay were better than the control group, the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The comparison between the two groups in the average operation time had no significant difference (P>0.05).Conclusion:Laparoscopic repair is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of gastrointestinal perforation,which has the advantages of surgical trauma,faster postoperative recovery,and low cost,it is worth to be promoted in the clinical treatment.