CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察比较解剖钢板与外固定架治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效。方法：收集青岛市骨伤科医院2011年7月-2012年7月病房收治的符合纳入标准的桡骨远端骨折患者40例，其中采用解剖钢板和外固定架固定分别各20例，经治疗均达到骨折临床愈合标准。对上述所有患者治疗后进行随访，术后应用Gartland and Werley评分标准对两组进行腕关节功能评价。结果：解剖钢板与外固定架治疗桡骨远端骨折均疗效显著，优良率分别达到85%和80%。解剖钢板组和外固定架组腕关节功能评分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：两种治疗方法的选择对桡骨远端骨折患者远期疗效和功能恢复无显著影响。
목적：관찰비교해부강판여외고정가치료뇨골원단골절적료효。방법：수집청도시골상과의원2011년7월-2012년7월병방수치적부합납입표준적뇨골원단골절환자40례，기중채용해부강판화외고정가고정분별각20례，경치료균체도골절림상유합표준。대상술소유환자치료후진행수방，술후응용Gartland and Werley평분표준대량조진행완관절공능평개。결과：해부강판여외고정가치료뇨골원단골절균료효현저，우량솔분별체도85%화80%。해부강판조화외고정가조완관절공능평분비교차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）。결론：량충치료방법적선택대뇨골원단골절환자원기료효화공능회복무현저영향。
Objective:To compare the clinical effect of anatomic steel plate and external fixation in the treatment of distal radius fracture. Method:40 patients of Othopidics and Traumatology Hospital of Qingdao from July 2011 to July 2012 were collected. The treatment of anatomic plate and external fixation respectively with 20 cases who suffered distal radius fracture all reaching the standard of fracture healing. Following up all the patients after treatment,evaluated the two groups of wrist joint function according to the Gartland and Werley standard. Result:Anatomical plate and external fixation achieved significant curative effect in the treatment of distal radius fractures,the effective rate reached 85%and 80%respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between anatomical plate group and the external fixation group by wrist function score comparison(P>0.05). Conclusion:The two methods have no significant effect on the Long-term curative effect and function recovery in patients with distal radius fracture.