全科医学临床与教育
全科醫學臨床與教育
전과의학림상여교육
CLINICAL EDUCATION OF GENERAL PRACTICE
2013年
5期
531-534
,共4页
季必宏%许海林%王文荣%邹伟荣%韩业红%陈健%张红东
季必宏%許海林%王文榮%鄒偉榮%韓業紅%陳健%張紅東
계필굉%허해림%왕문영%추위영%한업홍%진건%장홍동
下肢深静脉血栓形成%大隐静脉%腔静脉滤器
下肢深靜脈血栓形成%大隱靜脈%腔靜脈濾器
하지심정맥혈전형성%대은정맥%강정맥려기
deep venous thrombosis%great saphenous vein%vena cana filter
目的探讨经大隐静脉置入下腔静脉滤器(IVCF)的安全性和可行性。方法将有IVCF 置入指征的60例单侧下肢深静脉血栓形成患者随机分成经股静脉组(30例)和经大隐静脉组(30例),分别经股静脉穿刺和大隐静脉切开置入IVCF,比较两组患者的手术时间、切口长度、术后住院时间及并发症情况。结果两组60例患者均成功实施IVCF置入,无围手术期死亡患者。大隐静脉组手术时间与股静脉组比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.29,P>0.05),大隐静脉组手术切口长度长于腔静脉组,差异有统计学意义(t=-24.70,P<0.05),术后下床活动时间、术后住院时间均较股静脉短,差异均有统计学意义(t分别=35.04、3.30,P均<0.05)。大隐静脉组术后发生并发症例数和穿刺口点血肿明显少于股静脉组,差异有统计学意义(χ2分别=6.67、7.93,P均<0.05),两组均无死亡病例及切口感染病例。结论因经大隐静脉置入IVCF、安全可行,并发症发生率较低,是一种新型、可供选择的手术方式之一。
目的探討經大隱靜脈置入下腔靜脈濾器(IVCF)的安全性和可行性。方法將有IVCF 置入指徵的60例單側下肢深靜脈血栓形成患者隨機分成經股靜脈組(30例)和經大隱靜脈組(30例),分彆經股靜脈穿刺和大隱靜脈切開置入IVCF,比較兩組患者的手術時間、切口長度、術後住院時間及併髮癥情況。結果兩組60例患者均成功實施IVCF置入,無圍手術期死亡患者。大隱靜脈組手術時間與股靜脈組比較,差異無統計學意義(t=0.29,P>0.05),大隱靜脈組手術切口長度長于腔靜脈組,差異有統計學意義(t=-24.70,P<0.05),術後下床活動時間、術後住院時間均較股靜脈短,差異均有統計學意義(t分彆=35.04、3.30,P均<0.05)。大隱靜脈組術後髮生併髮癥例數和穿刺口點血腫明顯少于股靜脈組,差異有統計學意義(χ2分彆=6.67、7.93,P均<0.05),兩組均無死亡病例及切口感染病例。結論因經大隱靜脈置入IVCF、安全可行,併髮癥髮生率較低,是一種新型、可供選擇的手術方式之一。
목적탐토경대은정맥치입하강정맥려기(IVCF)적안전성화가행성。방법장유IVCF 치입지정적60례단측하지심정맥혈전형성환자수궤분성경고정맥조(30례)화경대은정맥조(30례),분별경고정맥천자화대은정맥절개치입IVCF,비교량조환자적수술시간、절구장도、술후주원시간급병발증정황。결과량조60례환자균성공실시IVCF치입,무위수술기사망환자。대은정맥조수술시간여고정맥조비교,차이무통계학의의(t=0.29,P>0.05),대은정맥조수술절구장도장우강정맥조,차이유통계학의의(t=-24.70,P<0.05),술후하상활동시간、술후주원시간균교고정맥단,차이균유통계학의의(t분별=35.04、3.30,P균<0.05)。대은정맥조술후발생병발증례수화천자구점혈종명현소우고정맥조,차이유통계학의의(χ2분별=6.67、7.93,P균<0.05),량조균무사망병례급절구감염병례。결론인경대은정맥치입IVCF、안전가행,병발증발생솔교저,시일충신형、가공선택적수술방식지일。
Objective To evaluate the feasibility and safety of vena cana filter (IVCF) placement through great saphe-nous vein. Methods Sixty cases of deep venous thrombosis(DVT) in unilateral lower limb who had the indication of IVCF placement were randomly divided into femoral vein group(30 patients) who were inserted IVCF through femoral vein punc-ture and great saphenous vein group (30 patients) who were inserted IVCF through great saphenous vein. The operation time, incision length, hospital stay and complications between two groups were compared. Results Sixty cases in two groups were inserted IVCF successfully without dead case. The surgical time had no significant difference between two groups (t=0.29,P>0.05). The incision length of saphenous vein group was significantly longer than that of femoral vein group(t=-24.70,P<0.05)while the leaving bed time and hospital stay were significantly shorter than femoral vein group(t=35.04,3.30,P<0.05).The complications and the incidences of hematoma at the site of the insertion in saphenous vein group were significantly less than those of femoral vein group (χ2=6.67,7.93,P<0.05). Conclusion The placement of IVCF through great saphenous vein is a safe, feasible and lower incidence of complications operation method.