中国妇幼健康研究
中國婦幼健康研究
중국부유건강연구
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH RESEARCH
2014年
2期
237-239
,共3页
薛瑞娟%南延荣%李丽%李红梅
薛瑞娟%南延榮%李麗%李紅梅
설서연%남연영%리려%리홍매
足月妊娠%羊水偏少%分娩方式%新生儿结局
足月妊娠%羊水偏少%分娩方式%新生兒結跼
족월임신%양수편소%분면방식%신생인결국
full-term pregnancy%borderline oligohydramnios%delivery mode%neonatal outcomes
目的:探讨足月妊娠羊水偏少对新生儿结局的影响。方法选择200例足月妊娠羊水偏少患者为观察组,同期154例羊水过少患者及191例羊水量正常孕妇为对照组,比较三组不同分娩方式下新生儿异常情况的发生率。结果羊水偏少组及羊水过少组新生儿异常发生率均高于羊水正常组(χ2=0.001,P<0.05),但羊水偏少组与羊水过少组新生儿异常发生率无统计学差异(χ2=0.978,P>0.05);不同分娩方式羊水偏少组与羊水过少组新生儿异常发生率无统计学差异(χ2值分别为0.103、0.117,均P>0.05);羊水偏少组与羊水过少组发生羊水污染者不同分娩方式新生儿异常情况无统计学差异(χ2值分别为0.804、0.151,均P>0.05)。结论足月妊娠羊水偏少不容忽视,同样易导致围产儿异常,阴道试产时应密切观察产程进展。
目的:探討足月妊娠羊水偏少對新生兒結跼的影響。方法選擇200例足月妊娠羊水偏少患者為觀察組,同期154例羊水過少患者及191例羊水量正常孕婦為對照組,比較三組不同分娩方式下新生兒異常情況的髮生率。結果羊水偏少組及羊水過少組新生兒異常髮生率均高于羊水正常組(χ2=0.001,P<0.05),但羊水偏少組與羊水過少組新生兒異常髮生率無統計學差異(χ2=0.978,P>0.05);不同分娩方式羊水偏少組與羊水過少組新生兒異常髮生率無統計學差異(χ2值分彆為0.103、0.117,均P>0.05);羊水偏少組與羊水過少組髮生羊水汙染者不同分娩方式新生兒異常情況無統計學差異(χ2值分彆為0.804、0.151,均P>0.05)。結論足月妊娠羊水偏少不容忽視,同樣易導緻圍產兒異常,陰道試產時應密切觀察產程進展。
목적:탐토족월임신양수편소대신생인결국적영향。방법선택200례족월임신양수편소환자위관찰조,동기154례양수과소환자급191례양수량정상잉부위대조조,비교삼조불동분면방식하신생인이상정황적발생솔。결과양수편소조급양수과소조신생인이상발생솔균고우양수정상조(χ2=0.001,P<0.05),단양수편소조여양수과소조신생인이상발생솔무통계학차이(χ2=0.978,P>0.05);불동분면방식양수편소조여양수과소조신생인이상발생솔무통계학차이(χ2치분별위0.103、0.117,균P>0.05);양수편소조여양수과소조발생양수오염자불동분면방식신생인이상정황무통계학차이(χ2치분별위0.804、0.151,균P>0.05)。결론족월임신양수편소불용홀시,동양역도치위산인이상,음도시산시응밀절관찰산정진전。
Objective To investigate the influence of borderline oligohydramnios with full-term pregnancy on neonatal outcomes .Methods Two hundred cases of full-term pregnancy with borderline oligohydramnios were selected as observation group , and 154 cases of oligohydramnios patients and 191 cases with normal amniotic fluid volume over the same period were selected randomly as control groups . The incidence of neonatal abnormalities was compared among three groups .Results The incidence of neonatal abnormalities in the patients of borderline oligohydramnios and those of oligohydramnios was significantly higher than in the cases with normal amniotic fluid volume (χ2 =0.001,P<0.05), but the difference between observation group and oligohydramnios group was not significant (χ2 =0.978,P>0.05).Different delivery modes showed no significant difference in the incidence of neonatal abnormalities between borderline oligohydramnios and oligohydramnios groups (χ2 value was 0.103 and 0.117, respectively, both P>0.05).By different delivery modes, observation group and oligohydramnios group with meconium-stained fluid had no significant difference in the incidence of neonatal abnormalities (χ2 value was 0.804 and 0.151, respectively, both P >0.05 ).Conclusion Full-term pregnancy with borderline oligohydramnios should not be ignored , and it also has severe impact on perinatal outcomes .Progress of vaginal delivery should be observed closely.