中国医药导刊
中國醫藥導刊
중국의약도간
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GUIDE
2013年
10期
1729-1729,1731
,共2页
腹腔镜%胆囊切除术%比较
腹腔鏡%膽囊切除術%比較
복강경%담낭절제술%비교
Laparoscopic%Cholecystectomy%Comparison
目的：：比较研究腹腔镜下胆囊切除手术与传统开腹手术的临床效果。方法：选取74例胆囊疾病患者作为研究对象，随机分为观察组46例及对照组28例，观察组采取腹腔镜手术，对照组采取传统开腹手术，比较两组治疗疗效。结果：观察组手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、住院时间短于(少于)对照组；观察组并发症发生率为2.17%，明显低于对照组的11.43%，差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：应用腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊疾病，切口小、创伤小、并发症少、术后患者恢复快，患者易接受，值得临床广泛应用。
目的：：比較研究腹腔鏡下膽囊切除手術與傳統開腹手術的臨床效果。方法：選取74例膽囊疾病患者作為研究對象，隨機分為觀察組46例及對照組28例，觀察組採取腹腔鏡手術，對照組採取傳統開腹手術，比較兩組治療療效。結果：觀察組手術時間、術中齣血量、術後排氣時間、住院時間短于(少于)對照組；觀察組併髮癥髮生率為2.17%，明顯低于對照組的11.43%，差異均具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論：應用腹腔鏡膽囊切除術治療膽囊疾病，切口小、創傷小、併髮癥少、術後患者恢複快，患者易接受，值得臨床廣汎應用。
목적：：비교연구복강경하담낭절제수술여전통개복수술적림상효과。방법：선취74례담낭질병환자작위연구대상，수궤분위관찰조46례급대조조28례，관찰조채취복강경수술，대조조채취전통개복수술，비교량조치료료효。결과：관찰조수술시간、술중출혈량、술후배기시간、주원시간단우(소우)대조조；관찰조병발증발생솔위2.17%，명현저우대조조적11.43%，차이균구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론：응용복강경담낭절제술치료담낭질병，절구소、창상소、병발증소、술후환자회복쾌，환자역접수，치득림상엄범응용。
Objective:To compare the gallbladder laparoscopic surgery and traditional open surgery effect.Methods:The 74 cases of gallbladder disease,patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group in 46 cases and cases,the observation group adopt laparoscopic surgery,control group adopts the traditional open surgery,compared with two groups of curative effect.Results:The observation group operation time,intraoperative amount of bleeding,postoperative exhaust time,shorter hospitalization time (less than) in the control group;The observation group complication rate was 2.17%,significantly lower than 11.43%in control group,the difference was significant (P<0.05).Conclusion:The application of laparoscopic cholecystectomy treatment of gallbladder disease,small incision,small trauma,fewer complications,and the patient recovered quickly,it is worth clinical application.
