上海预防医学
上海預防醫學
상해예방의학
SHANGHAI JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
2013年
10期
581-583,584
,共4页
吴玉琴%金磊磊%卢姝姝%彭丽洁%陈爱华%缪心军%姚晓秋%陈慧珍
吳玉琴%金磊磊%盧姝姝%彭麗潔%陳愛華%繆心軍%姚曉鞦%陳慧珍
오옥금%금뢰뢰%로주주%팽려길%진애화%무심군%요효추%진혜진
压疮%清创%效果评价
壓瘡%清創%效果評價
압창%청창%효과평개
Pressure ulcer%Debridement%Evaluation
[目的]探讨压疮愈合计分( PUSH)法在老年压疮病人的不同清创方法效果评定中的应用价值。[方法]2010年5月-2012年8月,60例(82处) II~IV期压疮并有清创指征的压疮伤口,随机分为自溶性清创组30例(42处);联合清创组30例(40处)。2组均按流程分别评估伤口与全身情况后,再进行冲洗、清创。2组伤口在清创后第7天、第14天、第21天进行观察和评价,按照PUSH计分表内容动态计分,用SPSS 11.0软件进行统计学分析。[结果]联合清创组与自溶性清创组的PUSH分值比较,在清创后第7天(P>0.05)、第14天(P<0.05)、第21天( P<0.01),联合清创组伤口PUSH分值下降快于自溶性清创组。[结论]联合清创是老年病人压疮的较好的清创方法,可缩短清创期,促进伤口的愈合。用PUSH计分法评价清创效果,方法简便易行,结果可信有效。
[目的]探討壓瘡愈閤計分( PUSH)法在老年壓瘡病人的不同清創方法效果評定中的應用價值。[方法]2010年5月-2012年8月,60例(82處) II~IV期壓瘡併有清創指徵的壓瘡傷口,隨機分為自溶性清創組30例(42處);聯閤清創組30例(40處)。2組均按流程分彆評估傷口與全身情況後,再進行遲洗、清創。2組傷口在清創後第7天、第14天、第21天進行觀察和評價,按照PUSH計分錶內容動態計分,用SPSS 11.0軟件進行統計學分析。[結果]聯閤清創組與自溶性清創組的PUSH分值比較,在清創後第7天(P>0.05)、第14天(P<0.05)、第21天( P<0.01),聯閤清創組傷口PUSH分值下降快于自溶性清創組。[結論]聯閤清創是老年病人壓瘡的較好的清創方法,可縮短清創期,促進傷口的愈閤。用PUSH計分法評價清創效果,方法簡便易行,結果可信有效。
[목적]탐토압창유합계분( PUSH)법재노년압창병인적불동청창방법효과평정중적응용개치。[방법]2010년5월-2012년8월,60례(82처) II~IV기압창병유청창지정적압창상구,수궤분위자용성청창조30례(42처);연합청창조30례(40처)。2조균안류정분별평고상구여전신정황후,재진행충세、청창。2조상구재청창후제7천、제14천、제21천진행관찰화평개,안조PUSH계분표내용동태계분,용SPSS 11.0연건진행통계학분석。[결과]연합청창조여자용성청창조적PUSH분치비교,재청창후제7천(P>0.05)、제14천(P<0.05)、제21천( P<0.01),연합청창조상구PUSH분치하강쾌우자용성청창조。[결론]연합청창시노년병인압창적교호적청창방법,가축단청창기,촉진상구적유합。용PUSH계분법평개청창효과,방법간편역행,결과가신유효。
[Objective] To explore the value of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing ( PUSH) tool in evaluating the effect of debridement on pressure ulcers in elder patients . [ Methods] A group of 60 patients with (82 sites) II-IV grade pressure ulcers were recruited in the study .The ulcers were randomly assigned into autolytic debridement group ( n=42 ) and combined debridement group ( n=40 ) .Two groups of wounds were assessed and debrided by consensus procedure porcess respectively .The wounds were ob-served and evaluated by trained nurses at 7,14,21days after debredement , and the results used in PUSH scoring were recorded and subjected to statistical analysis with the SPSS 11.0 software. [Results] The value of pressure ulcer scale for healing ( PUSH) for autolytic、combined debridement group , at 7days( P>0.05) were not significantly different, at 14 days(P<0.05),and at 21days (P<0.01) were significantly different.With wounds in combined debridement group , PUSH scores decreased faster than those in the au-tolytic debridement group . [ Conclusion] The combined debridement method used in elder patients is safe and effective , which can shorten debridement time and improve wounds healing as well .The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing is easy to use and its result is reliable , giving a quantitative objective evaluation of debridement effect on pressure ulcers .