CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对比分析腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效。方法：选择本院2011年2月-2013年2月收治的110例急性阑尾炎患者，分别采用腹腔镜手术和开腹手术治疗，比较分析两组患者的疗效。结果：腹腔镜组患者的术中出血量、术后进食时间、疼痛持续时间、镇痛剂使用率、肛门排气时间、住院时间以及并发症率均显著优于开腹组（P<0.05），但两组患者的手术时间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：与开腹手术相比，腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎具有安全、创伤小、恢复快、及并发症少等优势，可以作为治疗急性阑尾炎的首选方法。
목적：대비분석복강경수술여개복수술치료급성란미염적료효。방법：선택본원2011년2월-2013년2월수치적110례급성란미염환자，분별채용복강경수술화개복수술치료，비교분석량조환자적료효。결과：복강경조환자적술중출혈량、술후진식시간、동통지속시간、진통제사용솔、항문배기시간、주원시간이급병발증솔균현저우우개복조（P<0.05），단량조환자적수술시간비교차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）。결론：여개복수술상비，복강경수술치료급성란미염구유안전、창상소、회복쾌、급병발증소등우세，가이작위치료급성란미염적수선방법。
Objective:To compare and analyze the curative effect of laparoscopy versus open surgery for treatment of acute appendicitis. Method:110 patients with acute appendicitis in our hospital from February 2011 to February 2013 were randomly divided into observation group and control group. Observation group was given laparoscopy and control group was given open surgery,then analyzed the effects of the two groups. Result:The peri-operative bleeding,meal time after surgery,pain time,analgesic rate,anorectum exhaust time,hospitalization time,and complication rate of the laparoscopy group were significant better than those of the open surgery group(P<0.05). However,there was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion:Compared with open surgery,the laparoscopy for treatment of acute appendicitis has many advantages,including safety, minimal invasion,quick recovery,and few complications,it can be as preferred method to treat acute appendicitis.