中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2014年
3期
317-320
,共4页
郑克勤%黄娟娟%李红赞%吴伊茄%刘琳
鄭剋勤%黃娟娟%李紅讚%吳伊茄%劉琳
정극근%황연연%리홍찬%오이가%류림
护理学%专业适应性%影响因素
護理學%專業適應性%影響因素
호이학%전업괄응성%영향인소
Nursing%Professional adaptability%Influencing factor
目的:了解影响护理学专业本科生专业适应性的各种因素及其作用机制。方法采用专业适应性量表问卷对2010、2011级1105名学生进行调查,用SPSS 16.0软件对所得资料进行统计分析,计量资料以x±s表示,计数资料以百分比表示,根据年级、性别等变量分类的不同学生组间比较用t检验或方差分析。结果护理本科生专业适应性平均得分为(102.66±14.93),专业适应性水平在不同年级、性别之间差异具有统计学意义(P=0.0043,P=0.0015)。在可能影响专业适应性的其他因素,包括高考文理科不同生源、家庭所在地、家庭月收入等的调查中,仅在专业承诺一项指标中,文理科之间以及城镇和农村学生之间差异具有统计学意义(P=0.0298, P=0.0070)。结论年级、性别是护理本科生专业适应性的主要影响因素,文理科不同生源等其他因素对专业适应性无明显影响。
目的:瞭解影響護理學專業本科生專業適應性的各種因素及其作用機製。方法採用專業適應性量錶問捲對2010、2011級1105名學生進行調查,用SPSS 16.0軟件對所得資料進行統計分析,計量資料以x±s錶示,計數資料以百分比錶示,根據年級、性彆等變量分類的不同學生組間比較用t檢驗或方差分析。結果護理本科生專業適應性平均得分為(102.66±14.93),專業適應性水平在不同年級、性彆之間差異具有統計學意義(P=0.0043,P=0.0015)。在可能影響專業適應性的其他因素,包括高攷文理科不同生源、傢庭所在地、傢庭月收入等的調查中,僅在專業承諾一項指標中,文理科之間以及城鎮和農村學生之間差異具有統計學意義(P=0.0298, P=0.0070)。結論年級、性彆是護理本科生專業適應性的主要影響因素,文理科不同生源等其他因素對專業適應性無明顯影響。
목적:료해영향호이학전업본과생전업괄응성적각충인소급기작용궤제。방법채용전업괄응성량표문권대2010、2011급1105명학생진행조사,용SPSS 16.0연건대소득자료진행통계분석,계량자료이x±s표시,계수자료이백분비표시,근거년급、성별등변량분류적불동학생조간비교용t검험혹방차분석。결과호리본과생전업괄응성평균득분위(102.66±14.93),전업괄응성수평재불동년급、성별지간차이구유통계학의의(P=0.0043,P=0.0015)。재가능영향전업괄응성적기타인소,포괄고고문이과불동생원、가정소재지、가정월수입등적조사중,부재전업승낙일항지표중,문이과지간이급성진화농촌학생지간차이구유통계학의의(P=0.0298, P=0.0070)。결론년급、성별시호리본과생전업괄응성적주요영향인소,문이과불동생원등기타인소대전업괄응성무명현영향。
Objective To understand the influencing factors of professional adaptability for college nursing students and the mechanism. Methods A group of 1 105 college students from grades 2010 and 2011 were surveyed with questionnaire for professional adaptability. The data were analyzed with SPSS 16.0. Measurement data were expressed as x±s while enumeration data were expressed as percentage. t test and variance analysis were used to compare the differces among groups of different grades and genders. Results The professional adaptability mean score of college nursing students was (102.66 ± 14.93) and significant differences in professional adaptability were observed between different grades and genders (P=0.004 3, P=0.001 5). The possible influencing factors professional adaptability were different sources of students, family location, family income, etc. There were statis-tic differences in professional promise between arts and science students and between rural an urban students (P=0.029 8, P=0.007 0). Conclusion Grade and genders are the main influencing factors for professional adaptability of college nursing students while other factors exert little effect on it.