数理医药学杂志
數理醫藥學雜誌
수리의약학잡지
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL MEDICINE
2014年
2期
161-166
,共6页
吴俊超%杨洪清%杨静清%靳军%江广春%邬随焕%朱华威%张莉
吳俊超%楊洪清%楊靜清%靳軍%江廣春%鄔隨煥%硃華威%張莉
오준초%양홍청%양정청%근군%강엄춘%오수환%주화위%장리
妈咪爱%新生儿%高胆红素血症%Meta分析%随机对照试验
媽咪愛%新生兒%高膽紅素血癥%Meta分析%隨機對照試驗
마미애%신생인%고담홍소혈증%Meta분석%수궤대조시험
Medilac-Vita%neonate%hyperbilirubinemia%Meta analysis%randomized controlled trials
目的:评价妈咪爱对新生儿高胆红素血症(NHBE)的佐治作用,为进一步临床实践提供证据.方法:检索 Cochrane Li-brary(2012年第6期)、PubMed、Medline、Embase、中国学术期刊网络出版总库、万方数据库、维普数据库等,收集有关妈咪爱佐治NHBE的 RCT文献,检索文献起止时间均为建库至2012年10月.由2名作者进行资料提取和文献质量评价.应用 RevMan5.2软件进行Meta分析,根据异质性结果选择相应的效应模型分析;无法进行 Meta 分析时采用描述性分析.结果:13个 RCT 进入 Meta分析,全部文献均描述了具体随机化方法,但没有采用充分的分配隐藏和盲法;13篇均为中度偏倚风险.Meta 分析结果显示,诊断NHBE共计2061例,妈咪爱佐治组为53.13%,对照组为46.87%,日均胆红素下降值比较MD=15.52,95%CI(11.99,19.05),P<0.00001,差异有统计学意义;胆红素下降至正常值需要的治疗时间比较 MD=-1.83,95%CI(-2.10,-1.55),P<0.00001,差异有统计学意义.结论:Meta分析结果支持妈咪爱佐治 NHBE,建议开展设计更加科学,执行更加严谨的多中心大样本临床试验.
目的:評價媽咪愛對新生兒高膽紅素血癥(NHBE)的佐治作用,為進一步臨床實踐提供證據.方法:檢索 Cochrane Li-brary(2012年第6期)、PubMed、Medline、Embase、中國學術期刊網絡齣版總庫、萬方數據庫、維普數據庫等,收集有關媽咪愛佐治NHBE的 RCT文獻,檢索文獻起止時間均為建庫至2012年10月.由2名作者進行資料提取和文獻質量評價.應用 RevMan5.2軟件進行Meta分析,根據異質性結果選擇相應的效應模型分析;無法進行 Meta 分析時採用描述性分析.結果:13箇 RCT 進入 Meta分析,全部文獻均描述瞭具體隨機化方法,但沒有採用充分的分配隱藏和盲法;13篇均為中度偏倚風險.Meta 分析結果顯示,診斷NHBE共計2061例,媽咪愛佐治組為53.13%,對照組為46.87%,日均膽紅素下降值比較MD=15.52,95%CI(11.99,19.05),P<0.00001,差異有統計學意義;膽紅素下降至正常值需要的治療時間比較 MD=-1.83,95%CI(-2.10,-1.55),P<0.00001,差異有統計學意義.結論:Meta分析結果支持媽咪愛佐治 NHBE,建議開展設計更加科學,執行更加嚴謹的多中心大樣本臨床試驗.
목적:평개마미애대신생인고담홍소혈증(NHBE)적좌치작용,위진일보림상실천제공증거.방법:검색 Cochrane Li-brary(2012년제6기)、PubMed、Medline、Embase、중국학술기간망락출판총고、만방수거고、유보수거고등,수집유관마미애좌치NHBE적 RCT문헌,검색문헌기지시간균위건고지2012년10월.유2명작자진행자료제취화문헌질량평개.응용 RevMan5.2연건진행Meta분석,근거이질성결과선택상응적효응모형분석;무법진행 Meta 분석시채용묘술성분석.결과:13개 RCT 진입 Meta분석,전부문헌균묘술료구체수궤화방법,단몰유채용충분적분배은장화맹법;13편균위중도편의풍험.Meta 분석결과현시,진단NHBE공계2061례,마미애좌치조위53.13%,대조조위46.87%,일균담홍소하강치비교MD=15.52,95%CI(11.99,19.05),P<0.00001,차이유통계학의의;담홍소하강지정상치수요적치료시간비교 MD=-1.83,95%CI(-2.10,-1.55),P<0.00001,차이유통계학의의.결론:Meta분석결과지지마미애좌치 NHBE,건의개전설계경가과학,집행경가엄근적다중심대양본림상시험.
Objective:To evaluate adjunctive ly therapeutic effect of Medilac-Vita for Neonatal Hyperbil-irubinemia (NHBE,and to provide some clinically practical evidence.Methods:Cochrane Library(issue 6, 2012),PubMed,Medline,Embase,China academic journal network publishing data library,Wangfang data library,and Weipu data library were searched,and Randomized Controlled Trials(RTC)of Medilac-Vita’ adjunctively therapeutic effect for Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia were involved.The time of bibliographic re-trieval was from when the databases existed to October 2012.2 authors collected the data and evaluated qual-ity of data.Software of RevMan5 .2 was applied.Different Effect model analysis was chosen according to het-erogeneity results,while descriptive analysis failed to be done by meta analysis was adopted.Results:1 3 RCT were invlved,all of which descriped detailed randomization method,but there were no adopted sufficient allo-cation concealment and blinding,and showed medium risk of bias.It showed that 2061 patients were diag-nosed as NHBE,with 53.13% treated by Medilac-Vita,and 46.87% as control group.Comparison MD of av-erage daily bilirubin decreased value was 15.52,with 95%CI(11.99,19.05)and statistically significant differ-ence (P<0.00001).Comparison MD of therapeutic time how long bilirubin drops to normal was1.83,with 95%CI (-2.10,-1.55),and statistically significant difference (P<0.00001).Conclusion:Our results sup-port Medilac-Vita’adjunctively therapeutic effect for Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia.To further confirm, more scientific designs and rigorous multicenter,large sample clinical trials should be carried out.