数理医药学杂志
數理醫藥學雜誌
수리의약학잡지
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL MEDICINE
2014年
2期
153-156
,共4页
剖宫产子宫疤痕妊娠%治疗%综合治疗
剖宮產子宮疤痕妊娠%治療%綜閤治療
부궁산자궁파흔임신%치료%종합치료
cesarean scar pregnancy%treatment%comprehensive therapy
目的:探讨剖宫产术后子宫疤痕妊娠的治疗方法.方法:回顾性分析我院2000~2012年收治的70例 CSP 患者.结果:CSP在药物治疗过程中,治疗成功率、血β-HCG 转阴天数、以及在超声监测下孕囊或者包块消失天数方面,局部用药、全身用药等各组之间比较无差异(P>0.05).手术治疗过程中,在血β-HCG转阴天数以及在超声下孕囊或者包块消失天数方面比较,介入手术+病灶切除组优于介入手术+刮宫术组(P<0.05),病灶切除组优于介入手术+刮宫术组(P<0.05),子宫全切术组优于介入手术+刮宫术组(P<0.05).在综合治疗过程中,在血β-HCG转阴天数以及在超声下孕囊或者包块消失天数方面比较,介入+刮宫+药物组优于药物+刮宫治疗组(P<0.05),介入+刮宫+药物组显著优于介入+药物治疗组(P<0.01).结论:CSP 患者,超声检查为首选辅助检查,综合治疗是较为理想的治疗方案.
目的:探討剖宮產術後子宮疤痕妊娠的治療方法.方法:迴顧性分析我院2000~2012年收治的70例 CSP 患者.結果:CSP在藥物治療過程中,治療成功率、血β-HCG 轉陰天數、以及在超聲鑑測下孕囊或者包塊消失天數方麵,跼部用藥、全身用藥等各組之間比較無差異(P>0.05).手術治療過程中,在血β-HCG轉陰天數以及在超聲下孕囊或者包塊消失天數方麵比較,介入手術+病竈切除組優于介入手術+颳宮術組(P<0.05),病竈切除組優于介入手術+颳宮術組(P<0.05),子宮全切術組優于介入手術+颳宮術組(P<0.05).在綜閤治療過程中,在血β-HCG轉陰天數以及在超聲下孕囊或者包塊消失天數方麵比較,介入+颳宮+藥物組優于藥物+颳宮治療組(P<0.05),介入+颳宮+藥物組顯著優于介入+藥物治療組(P<0.01).結論:CSP 患者,超聲檢查為首選輔助檢查,綜閤治療是較為理想的治療方案.
목적:탐토부궁산술후자궁파흔임신적치료방법.방법:회고성분석아원2000~2012년수치적70례 CSP 환자.결과:CSP재약물치료과정중,치료성공솔、혈β-HCG 전음천수、이급재초성감측하잉낭혹자포괴소실천수방면,국부용약、전신용약등각조지간비교무차이(P>0.05).수술치료과정중,재혈β-HCG전음천수이급재초성하잉낭혹자포괴소실천수방면비교,개입수술+병조절제조우우개입수술+괄궁술조(P<0.05),병조절제조우우개입수술+괄궁술조(P<0.05),자궁전절술조우우개입수술+괄궁술조(P<0.05).재종합치료과정중,재혈β-HCG전음천수이급재초성하잉낭혹자포괴소실천수방면비교,개입+괄궁+약물조우우약물+괄궁치료조(P<0.05),개입+괄궁+약물조현저우우개입+약물치료조(P<0.01).결론:CSP 환자,초성검사위수선보조검사,종합치료시교위이상적치료방안.
Objective:To investigate the therapeutic method for cesarean scar pregnancy.Methods:The management process of 70 cases of the Cesarean scar pregnancy was retrospectively analyzed in our hospital from 2000 to 2012.Results:In the medical treatment process,Drug groups between the success rate 、bloodβ-HCG cloudy days and the gestational sac or mass disappearance days there are no difference to compare(P>0.05).In the process of operation treatment,Interventional operation + excision group is better than that of interventional operation + curettage group(P< 0.05),excision of focus group is better than that of inter-ventional operation + curettage group(P< 0.05),hysterectomy group is better than that of interventional operation + curettage group(P< 0.05)in the bloodβ-HCG cloudy days and the gestational sac or mass dis-appearance days.In the comprehensive treatment process,Intervention therapy + curettage + drug group is better than the drug + curettage in the treatment group(P< 0.05),interventional + curettage + drug group was significantly better than the intervention therapy and drug therapy group(P< 0.01)in the bloodβ-HCG cloudy days and the gestational sac or mass disappearance days.Conclusion:In CSP patients,sonog-raphy is the preferred auxiliary examination,comprehensive therapy is an ideal therapy scheme.