东南大学学报(医学版)
東南大學學報(醫學版)
동남대학학보(의학판)
JOURNAL OF SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY(MEDICAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2014年
2期
137-140
,共4页
饶海承%高卫丰%龚伟%于如同%高山%何培武%石祥飞
饒海承%高衛豐%龔偉%于如同%高山%何培武%石祥飛
요해승%고위봉%공위%우여동%고산%하배무%석상비
颅脑外伤%额叶%枕叶%颞叶%丘脑%基底节%认知功能
顱腦外傷%額葉%枕葉%顳葉%丘腦%基底節%認知功能
로뇌외상%액협%침협%섭협%구뇌%기저절%인지공능
craniocerebral injury%frontal lobe%occipital lobe%temporal lobe%basal ganglia%thalamus%cognitive function
目的:探讨不同部位损伤对颅脑外伤患者认知功能的影响,为颅脑损伤患者认知功能损害的早期诊断和治疗提供参考依据。方法:采用简易智能状态检查量表( MMSE )和中文版蒙特利尔认知评估量表( MoCA)对222例颅脑外伤患者进行认知功能测评,比较不同损伤部位对认知功能的影响。结果:不同部位损伤的颅脑外伤患者认知障碍的发生率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),其中额叶组视空间及执行功能评分明显低于其他各组,丘脑组延迟回忆评分与顶叶、枕叶和基底节组差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。而颞叶组注意力评分及语言能力评分明显低于其他各组,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论:不同部位脑损伤患者认知障碍的发生率及认知损害的特点不同。
目的:探討不同部位損傷對顱腦外傷患者認知功能的影響,為顱腦損傷患者認知功能損害的早期診斷和治療提供參攷依據。方法:採用簡易智能狀態檢查量錶( MMSE )和中文版矇特利爾認知評估量錶( MoCA)對222例顱腦外傷患者進行認知功能測評,比較不同損傷部位對認知功能的影響。結果:不同部位損傷的顱腦外傷患者認知障礙的髮生率差異有統計學意義(P<0.01),其中額葉組視空間及執行功能評分明顯低于其他各組,丘腦組延遲迴憶評分與頂葉、枕葉和基底節組差異有統計學意義( P<0.05)。而顳葉組註意力評分及語言能力評分明顯低于其他各組,差異有統計學意義( P<0.05)。結論:不同部位腦損傷患者認知障礙的髮生率及認知損害的特點不同。
목적:탐토불동부위손상대로뇌외상환자인지공능적영향,위로뇌손상환자인지공능손해적조기진단화치료제공삼고의거。방법:채용간역지능상태검사량표( MMSE )화중문판몽특리이인지평고량표( MoCA)대222례로뇌외상환자진행인지공능측평,비교불동손상부위대인지공능적영향。결과:불동부위손상적로뇌외상환자인지장애적발생솔차이유통계학의의(P<0.01),기중액협조시공간급집행공능평분명현저우기타각조,구뇌조연지회억평분여정협、침협화기저절조차이유통계학의의( P<0.05)。이섭협조주의력평분급어언능력평분명현저우기타각조,차이유통계학의의( P<0.05)。결론:불동부위뇌손상환자인지장애적발생솔급인지손해적특점불동。
Objective:To explore the cognitive function in patients with craniocerebral injury of different areas , provide a reference for the early diagnosis and treatment of cognitive impairment in patients with traumatic brain injury.Methods: 222 cases with craniocerebral injury were included in the current study , their cognitive dysfunction was evaluated with Mini-Mental State Examination ( MMSE ) and Montreal cognitive assessment scale ( MoCA) , and different effects on cognitive function were compared .Results: The difference in the incidence of the different parts of the brain trauma injury cognitive impairment in patients was significantly different ( P<0.01) , visuospatial and executive functions of the frontal lobe group scores were significantly lower than the other groups , hypothalamus group delayed recall score and the parietal lobe , occipital lobe and basal ganglia group difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05 ); temporal lobe group attention scores were significantly lower than the other groups, the difference was not statistically significant ( P <0.05 ) , and the temporal lobe group language proficiency rating also significantly lower than other groups , the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05 ) .Conclusion: The incidence and characteristics of cognitive impairment is different for different parts of thecerebral infarction.