泰山医学院学报
泰山醫學院學報
태산의학원학보
JOURNAL OF TAISHAN MEDICAL COLLEGE
2014年
5期
391-392
,共2页
乳腺钼靶X线%超声诊断%乳腺导管内癌
乳腺鉬靶X線%超聲診斷%乳腺導管內癌
유선목파X선%초성진단%유선도관내암
X-ray mammography%Ultrasonography%breast ductal carcinoma
目的:探讨乳腺钼靶 X 线摄影和超声诊断乳腺导管内癌症的对照研究。方法回顾性分析2013年1月至2013年10月在我院住院治疗的43例乳腺导管内癌,且均经过病理确诊。对43例患者分别行乳腺钼靶 X 线超声摄影和超声诊断,对比两种检查方案的结果。结果乳腺钼靶 X 线超声摄影结果显示:丛样微小钙化点患者18例,比例为41.86%,边界呈现不规则的高密度影患者为15例,比例为34.88%,随后造影下 X 线检查发现10例患者导管充盈缺损,比例是23.26%。超声检查结果则是边界与周边组织部清晰以及不规则实性肿块患者为11例,比例是25.58%,而边界清晰的规则肿块则为9例,比例是20.93%,囊性肿块为4例,比例是9.3%。可知乳腺钼靶 X 线超声诊断符合率为76.74%(33/43),而超声诊断符合率仅为55.81%(24/43),差异有统计学意义(P ﹤0.05)。结论乳腺钼靶 X 线超声摄影相比于超声对于乳腺导管内癌的诊断符合率更高,临床检查时当联合两者优势,提高确诊率。
目的:探討乳腺鉬靶 X 線攝影和超聲診斷乳腺導管內癌癥的對照研究。方法迴顧性分析2013年1月至2013年10月在我院住院治療的43例乳腺導管內癌,且均經過病理確診。對43例患者分彆行乳腺鉬靶 X 線超聲攝影和超聲診斷,對比兩種檢查方案的結果。結果乳腺鉬靶 X 線超聲攝影結果顯示:叢樣微小鈣化點患者18例,比例為41.86%,邊界呈現不規則的高密度影患者為15例,比例為34.88%,隨後造影下 X 線檢查髮現10例患者導管充盈缺損,比例是23.26%。超聲檢查結果則是邊界與週邊組織部清晰以及不規則實性腫塊患者為11例,比例是25.58%,而邊界清晰的規則腫塊則為9例,比例是20.93%,囊性腫塊為4例,比例是9.3%。可知乳腺鉬靶 X 線超聲診斷符閤率為76.74%(33/43),而超聲診斷符閤率僅為55.81%(24/43),差異有統計學意義(P ﹤0.05)。結論乳腺鉬靶 X 線超聲攝影相比于超聲對于乳腺導管內癌的診斷符閤率更高,臨床檢查時噹聯閤兩者優勢,提高確診率。
목적:탐토유선목파 X 선섭영화초성진단유선도관내암증적대조연구。방법회고성분석2013년1월지2013년10월재아원주원치료적43례유선도관내암,차균경과병리학진。대43례환자분별행유선목파 X 선초성섭영화초성진단,대비량충검사방안적결과。결과유선목파 X 선초성섭영결과현시:총양미소개화점환자18례,비례위41.86%,변계정현불규칙적고밀도영환자위15례,비례위34.88%,수후조영하 X 선검사발현10례환자도관충영결손,비례시23.26%。초성검사결과칙시변계여주변조직부청석이급불규칙실성종괴환자위11례,비례시25.58%,이변계청석적규칙종괴칙위9례,비례시20.93%,낭성종괴위4례,비례시9.3%。가지유선목파 X 선초성진단부합솔위76.74%(33/43),이초성진단부합솔부위55.81%(24/43),차이유통계학의의(P ﹤0.05)。결론유선목파 X 선초성섭영상비우초성대우유선도관내암적진단부합솔경고,림상검사시당연합량자우세,제고학진솔。
Objective:To investigate the symptoms of mammography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast ductal cancer. Methods:Retrospective analysis was made from 2013 January to 2013 October in the treatment of 43 cases of breast ductal carcinoma pathologically confirmed in our hospital. The 43 patients underwent X-ray mammography and ultrasonogra-phy in the diagnosis of sonographic examination,results of two kinds of scheme were compared. Results:Breast molybde-num target X-ray photography showed ultrasonic cluster like small calcification in 18 cases,the ratio was 41. 86% ,an ir-regular high density shadow boundary in 15 cases,the ratio was 34. 88% ,then X-ray findings of 10 patients were compared with catheter filling defect,the ratio was 23. 26% . Ultrasound examination was the boundary with the surrounding tissue, clear and irregular solid mass in 11 cases,the ratio was 25. 58% ,and the rules clear boundary mass in 9 cases,the ratio was 20. 93% ,and cystic mass in 4 cases,the ratio was 9. 3% . The breast molybdenum target X-ray ultrasound diagnosis coincidence rate was 76. 74% ,and ultrasound diagnosis coincidence rate was 55. 81% ,which showed significant difference (P ﹤ 0. 05). Conclusion:Compared with breast molybdenum target,X-ray photography in ultrasound diagnosis of ultra-sound for breast ductal carcinoma has a higher rate,and improves the diagnosis rate when combined with the advantages of both in clinical examination.