重庆医学
重慶醫學
중경의학
CHONGQING MEDICAL JOURNAL
2013年
30期
3604-3605,3609
,共3页
张宗美%赵岭%王义亮%刘艺%王少璐%何艳
張宗美%趙嶺%王義亮%劉藝%王少璐%何豔
장종미%조령%왕의량%류예%왕소로%하염
弹性成像技术%超声检查,多普勒,彩色%钼靶X线%乳腺病变
彈性成像技術%超聲檢查,多普勒,綵色%鉬靶X線%乳腺病變
탄성성상기술%초성검사,다보륵,채색%목파X선%유선병변
elasticity imaging techniques%ultrasonography,doppler,color%mammography%breast disease
目的:探讨超声弹性成像、彩色多普勒超声与钼靶X线诊断乳腺疾病的价值。方法回顾分析经病理证实的528例,共576个手术病灶,分别分析超声弹性成像、彩色多普勒超声、钼靶X线以及三者联合的对乳腺病变诊断敏感性、特异性、准确性。结果超声弹性成像对乳腺病变诊断敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为85.2%(196/230)、81.8%(283/346)、83.2%(479/576);彩色多普勒超声对乳腺病变诊断敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为84.3%(194/230)、83.5%(289/346)、83.9%(483/576);钼靶X线对乳腺病变诊断敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为79.1%(182/230)、76.6%(265/346)、77.6%(447/576);三者联合对乳腺病变诊断敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为93.0%(214/230)、91.3%(316/346)、92.0%(530/576)。结论超声弹性成像对乳腺病变诊断具有较高的敏感性和特异性,弥补了彩色多普勒超声及钼靶X线对乳腺疾病诊断的不足。
目的:探討超聲彈性成像、綵色多普勒超聲與鉬靶X線診斷乳腺疾病的價值。方法迴顧分析經病理證實的528例,共576箇手術病竈,分彆分析超聲彈性成像、綵色多普勒超聲、鉬靶X線以及三者聯閤的對乳腺病變診斷敏感性、特異性、準確性。結果超聲彈性成像對乳腺病變診斷敏感性、特異性、準確性分彆為85.2%(196/230)、81.8%(283/346)、83.2%(479/576);綵色多普勒超聲對乳腺病變診斷敏感性、特異性、準確性分彆為84.3%(194/230)、83.5%(289/346)、83.9%(483/576);鉬靶X線對乳腺病變診斷敏感性、特異性、準確性分彆為79.1%(182/230)、76.6%(265/346)、77.6%(447/576);三者聯閤對乳腺病變診斷敏感性、特異性、準確性分彆為93.0%(214/230)、91.3%(316/346)、92.0%(530/576)。結論超聲彈性成像對乳腺病變診斷具有較高的敏感性和特異性,瀰補瞭綵色多普勒超聲及鉬靶X線對乳腺疾病診斷的不足。
목적:탐토초성탄성성상、채색다보륵초성여목파X선진단유선질병적개치。방법회고분석경병리증실적528례,공576개수술병조,분별분석초성탄성성상、채색다보륵초성、목파X선이급삼자연합적대유선병변진단민감성、특이성、준학성。결과초성탄성성상대유선병변진단민감성、특이성、준학성분별위85.2%(196/230)、81.8%(283/346)、83.2%(479/576);채색다보륵초성대유선병변진단민감성、특이성、준학성분별위84.3%(194/230)、83.5%(289/346)、83.9%(483/576);목파X선대유선병변진단민감성、특이성、준학성분별위79.1%(182/230)、76.6%(265/346)、77.6%(447/576);삼자연합대유선병변진단민감성、특이성、준학성분별위93.0%(214/230)、91.3%(316/346)、92.0%(530/576)。결론초성탄성성상대유선병변진단구유교고적민감성화특이성,미보료채색다보륵초성급목파X선대유선질병진단적불족。
Objective To analyze the performance of ultrasonic elastography (UE) ,color doppler flow imaging(CDFI) and mam-mography in breast neoplasms and discuss the value of the three methods in breast disease diagnosis .Methods Retrospective analy-sis of 528 cases were pathologically confirmed ,including 576 surgical lesions .the diagnostic sensitivity ,specificity and accuracy of breast lesions were analyzed by UE ,CDFI ,X-ray separately and combined methods .Results For UE in diagnosis of breast cancer , the sensitivity ,specificity and accuracy were 85 .2% (196/230) ,81 .8% (283/346) ,83 .2% (479/576)respectively .For CDFI meth-od ,the sensitivity ,specificity and accuracy were 84 .3% (194/230) ,83 .5% (289/346) ,83 .9% (483/576)respectively .For mammog-raphy method ,the sensitivity ,specificity and accuracy were 79 .1% (182/230) ,76 .6% (265/346) ,77 .6% (447/576) .The sensitivi-ty ,specificity and accuracy of combined diagnosis by three methods on breast lesions were 93 .0% (214/230) ,91 .3% (316/346) , 92 .0% (530/576) .Conclusion The diagnosis of breast lesions by UE is of high sensitivity and specificity ,which could make up for the lack of CDFI and mammography in the diagnosis of breast diseases .