中国康复理论与实践
中國康複理論與實踐
중국강복이론여실천
CHINESE JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION THEORY & PRACTICE
2013年
10期
967-969
,共3页
王俊卿%周筱燕%张嘉锋%李源莉%郭克锋
王俊卿%週篠燕%張嘉鋒%李源莉%郭剋鋒
왕준경%주소연%장가봉%리원리%곽극봉
心理康复%运动功能%康复医学
心理康複%運動功能%康複醫學
심리강복%운동공능%강복의학
psychological rehabilitation%motor function%rehabilitation medicine
目的:观察心理康复对肢体运动功能障碍康复的作用。方法将136例住院需进行康复治疗和训练的患者分为观察组和对照组各68例。对照组仅给予常规康复训练和康复治疗,观察组在此基础上介入心理康复治疗(包括心理治疗和药物治疗)。治疗前和治疗8周后,采用精神卫生症状自评量表(SCL-90)、Fugl-Meyer评定法(FMA)和改良Barthel指数(MBI)进行评价。结果136例患者均存在较多的心理问题,其中以焦虑、抑郁、躯体化、恐惧、敌对为著,两组患者治疗前SCL-90评分、FMA评分和MBI评分均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。治疗后观察组除精神病性(P>0.05)外,SCL-90评分均低于对照组(P<0.05);FMA评分和MBI评分均明显高于对照组(P<0.01)。结论心理康复在整体康复过程中具有重要的作用。
目的:觀察心理康複對肢體運動功能障礙康複的作用。方法將136例住院需進行康複治療和訓練的患者分為觀察組和對照組各68例。對照組僅給予常規康複訓練和康複治療,觀察組在此基礎上介入心理康複治療(包括心理治療和藥物治療)。治療前和治療8週後,採用精神衛生癥狀自評量錶(SCL-90)、Fugl-Meyer評定法(FMA)和改良Barthel指數(MBI)進行評價。結果136例患者均存在較多的心理問題,其中以焦慮、抑鬱、軀體化、恐懼、敵對為著,兩組患者治療前SCL-90評分、FMA評分和MBI評分均無顯著性差異(P>0.05)。治療後觀察組除精神病性(P>0.05)外,SCL-90評分均低于對照組(P<0.05);FMA評分和MBI評分均明顯高于對照組(P<0.01)。結論心理康複在整體康複過程中具有重要的作用。
목적:관찰심리강복대지체운동공능장애강복적작용。방법장136례주원수진행강복치료화훈련적환자분위관찰조화대조조각68례。대조조부급여상규강복훈련화강복치료,관찰조재차기출상개입심리강복치료(포괄심리치료화약물치료)。치료전화치료8주후,채용정신위생증상자평량표(SCL-90)、Fugl-Meyer평정법(FMA)화개량Barthel지수(MBI)진행평개。결과136례환자균존재교다적심리문제,기중이초필、억욱、구체화、공구、활대위저,량조환자치료전SCL-90평분、FMA평분화MBI평분균무현저성차이(P>0.05)。치료후관찰조제정신병성(P>0.05)외,SCL-90평분균저우대조조(P<0.05);FMA평분화MBI평분균명현고우대조조(P<0.01)。결론심리강복재정체강복과정중구유중요적작용。
Objective To explore the effect of psychological rehabilitation on patients with limb motor dysfunction. Methods 136 cases of hospitalized patients who needed rehabilitation therapy and training were divided into observation group and control group. The control group received conventional rehabilitation, and the observation group received psychological rehabilitation (psychotherapy and medicine) in addition. Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and modified Barthel Index (MBI) were assessed before and 8 weeks after treatment. Results Most of the 136 patients were involved in psychological problems, including anxiety, depression, somatiza-tion, fear, hostility. There was no difference in the scores of SCL-90, FMA and MBI between 2 groups before treatment (P>0.05). After 8 weeks treatment, the scores of SCL-90 were lower, except psychotism (P>0.05), in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05), the scores of FMA and MBI were higher in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.01). Conclusion The psychological rehabil-itation plays an important role in rehabilitation of limb motor dysfunction.