CAJ | 학술논문

采集太原市周边县区4个规模场的牛血清样品400份，用虎红平板凝集试验（RBPT）、试管凝集试验（SAT）、iELISA进行抗体检测，比较三种检测方法的敏感性和特异性差异。结果表明三种方法检测结果一致率较高，但是RBPT和SAT均有较高的假阳性和假阴性，三种方法中iELISA的敏感性和特异性最好。结论是在布病检测时可选择操作简便的RBPT进行初筛，阳性结果用iELISA进行确诊。
채집태원시주변현구4개규모장적우혈청양품400빈，용호홍평판응집시험（RBPT）、시관응집시험（SAT）、iELISA진행항체검측，비교삼충검측방법적민감성화특이성차이。결과표명삼충방법검측결과일치솔교고，단시RBPT화SAT균유교고적가양성화가음성，삼충방법중iELISA적민감성화특이성최호。결론시재포병검측시가선택조작간편적RBPT진행초사，양성결과용iELISA진행학진。
400 bovine serum samples from Taiyuan were examined by Rose bengal plate Test(RBPT),standard tube agglutination test(SAT)and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA),the sensibility and speciifcity of these methods were compared. The result showed that the concordance rate of the three methods was relatively high,but the false positive and false negative rate were relatively high with RBPT and SAT,the sensibility and speciifcity of the iELI-SA were the best. The conclusion was that the RBPT could be used in the ifeld screening,and the positive results should be further conifrmed by the iELISA.