光谱学与光谱分析
光譜學與光譜分析
광보학여광보분석
SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS
2013年
11期
3128-3132
,共5页
李连中%卓尚军%申如香%钱荣%高捷
李連中%卓尚軍%申如香%錢榮%高捷
리련중%탁상군%신여향%전영%고첩
XPS%AES%定量分析%相对灵敏度因子
XPS%AES%定量分析%相對靈敏度因子
XPS%AES%정량분석%상대령민도인자
XPS%AES%Quantitative analysis%Relative sensitivity factors
俄歇电子能谱(A ES )在表面微区元素分析方面优势明显,但是受基体效应的影响,其定量分析,特别是非单质材料表面元素含量分析的准确度差,X射线光电子能谱(XPS)的定量分析准确度较高。为了降低AES定量分析的误差,将XPS和AES两种分析技术联用,选择Pt-Co ,Cu-Au和Cu-Ag三种二元合金样品进行了研究,利用样品的XPS定量分析结果对AES的定量分析所用相对灵敏度因子进行修正,将修正后的相对灵敏度因子用于其他不同组分比的样品的定量分析,以验证其分析准确性。结果表明,修正后的灵敏度因子在用于A ES定量分析时相对误差明显降低,分析相对误差小于10%。为了解决A ES定量分析在积分谱处理形式下选峰困难的问题,将积分谱进行微分化处理,并修正了微分谱的处理形式下的相对灵敏度因子,A ES的定量分析相对误差降低到小于9%,表明在两种处理形式下都能得到较为准确的定量结果。修正后的相对灵敏度因子包含了基体效应尤其是背散射效应的影响,从而有助于降低A ES定量分析的误差。说明借助XPS提高AES定量分析准确度的研究方法具有一定的可行性。
俄歇電子能譜(A ES )在錶麵微區元素分析方麵優勢明顯,但是受基體效應的影響,其定量分析,特彆是非單質材料錶麵元素含量分析的準確度差,X射線光電子能譜(XPS)的定量分析準確度較高。為瞭降低AES定量分析的誤差,將XPS和AES兩種分析技術聯用,選擇Pt-Co ,Cu-Au和Cu-Ag三種二元閤金樣品進行瞭研究,利用樣品的XPS定量分析結果對AES的定量分析所用相對靈敏度因子進行脩正,將脩正後的相對靈敏度因子用于其他不同組分比的樣品的定量分析,以驗證其分析準確性。結果錶明,脩正後的靈敏度因子在用于A ES定量分析時相對誤差明顯降低,分析相對誤差小于10%。為瞭解決A ES定量分析在積分譜處理形式下選峰睏難的問題,將積分譜進行微分化處理,併脩正瞭微分譜的處理形式下的相對靈敏度因子,A ES的定量分析相對誤差降低到小于9%,錶明在兩種處理形式下都能得到較為準確的定量結果。脩正後的相對靈敏度因子包含瞭基體效應尤其是揹散射效應的影響,從而有助于降低A ES定量分析的誤差。說明藉助XPS提高AES定量分析準確度的研究方法具有一定的可行性。
아헐전자능보(A ES )재표면미구원소분석방면우세명현,단시수기체효응적영향,기정량분석,특별시비단질재료표면원소함량분석적준학도차,X사선광전자능보(XPS)적정량분석준학도교고。위료강저AES정량분석적오차,장XPS화AES량충분석기술련용,선택Pt-Co ,Cu-Au화Cu-Ag삼충이원합금양품진행료연구,이용양품적XPS정량분석결과대AES적정량분석소용상대령민도인자진행수정,장수정후적상대령민도인자용우기타불동조분비적양품적정량분석,이험증기분석준학성。결과표명,수정후적령민도인자재용우A ES정량분석시상대오차명현강저,분석상대오차소우10%。위료해결A ES정량분석재적분보처리형식하선봉곤난적문제,장적분보진행미분화처리,병수정료미분보적처리형식하적상대령민도인자,A ES적정량분석상대오차강저도소우9%,표명재량충처리형식하도능득도교위준학적정량결과。수정후적상대령민도인자포함료기체효응우기시배산사효응적영향,종이유조우강저A ES정량분석적오차。설명차조XPS제고AES정량분석준학도적연구방법구유일정적가행성。
In order to improve the quantitative analysis accuracy of AES ,We associated XPS with AES and studied the method to reduce the error of AES quantitative analysis ,selected Pt-Co ,Cu-Au and Cu-Ag binary alloy thin-films as the samples ,used XPS to correct AES quantitative analysis results by changing the auger sensitivity factors to make their quantitative analysis re-sults more similar .Then we verified the accuracy of the quantitative analysis of AES when using the revised sensitivity factors by other samples with different composition ratio ,and the results showed that the corrected relative sensitivity factors can reduce the error in quantitative analysis of AES to less than 10% .Peak defining is difficult in the form of the integral spectrum of AES analysis since choosing the starting point and ending point when determining the characteristic auger peak intensity area with great uncertainty ,and to make analysis easier ,we also processed data in the form of the differential spectrum ,made quantitative analysis on the basis of peak to peak height instead of peak area ,corrected the relative sensitivity factors ,and verified the accura-cy of quantitative analysis by the other samples with different composition ratio .The result showed that the analytical error in quantitative analysis of AES reduced to less than 9% .It showed that the accuracy of AES quantitative analysis can be highly im-proved by the way of associating XPS with AES to correct the auger sensitivity factors since the matrix effects are taken into ac-count .Good consistency was presented ,proving the feasibility of this method .