实用医学杂志
實用醫學雜誌
실용의학잡지
THE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL MEDICINE
2014年
5期
745-747
,共3页
范存静%刘超%何艳新%申东方%庞志刚
範存靜%劉超%何豔新%申東方%龐誌剛
범존정%류초%하염신%신동방%방지강
外科伤口感染%延期缝合%抗菌薇乔线%皮下引流管
外科傷口感染%延期縫閤%抗菌薇喬線%皮下引流管
외과상구감염%연기봉합%항균미교선%피하인류관
Surgical wound infection%Suturing late%Triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 suture%Subcutaneous drain tube
目的:探讨皮下置管引流及切口预置抗菌薇乔线延期缝合对腹部Ⅲ类手术后切口感染的影响。方法:将所收集的504例Ⅲ类切口腹部外科手术患者分成3组:A组(术后彻底冲洗切口后行一期缝合)143例,B组(术后关闭腹膜至腹直肌前鞘后切口预置抗菌薇乔线未缝合)190例,C组(术后皮下放置引流管)171例。比较3组术后切口感染率及切口二期清创缝合率。结果:A组有11例切口感染,感染率为7.69%;B组有4例切口感染,感染率为2.11%;C组有3例切口感染,感染率为1.75%。3组总体切口感染率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),B组和C组切口感染率较A组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.0167)。3组切口感染患者二期清创缝合率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:Ⅲ类切口腹部外科手术后预置抗菌薇乔线切口延期缝合及放置皮下引流管的方法可以降低切口感染率,但不能降低感染切口的二期清创缝合率。
目的:探討皮下置管引流及切口預置抗菌薇喬線延期縫閤對腹部Ⅲ類手術後切口感染的影響。方法:將所收集的504例Ⅲ類切口腹部外科手術患者分成3組:A組(術後徹底遲洗切口後行一期縫閤)143例,B組(術後關閉腹膜至腹直肌前鞘後切口預置抗菌薇喬線未縫閤)190例,C組(術後皮下放置引流管)171例。比較3組術後切口感染率及切口二期清創縫閤率。結果:A組有11例切口感染,感染率為7.69%;B組有4例切口感染,感染率為2.11%;C組有3例切口感染,感染率為1.75%。3組總體切口感染率差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),B組和C組切口感染率較A組低,差異有統計學意義(P<0.0167)。3組切口感染患者二期清創縫閤率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論:Ⅲ類切口腹部外科手術後預置抗菌薇喬線切口延期縫閤及放置皮下引流管的方法可以降低切口感染率,但不能降低感染切口的二期清創縫閤率。
목적:탐토피하치관인류급절구예치항균미교선연기봉합대복부Ⅲ류수술후절구감염적영향。방법:장소수집적504례Ⅲ류절구복부외과수술환자분성3조:A조(술후철저충세절구후행일기봉합)143례,B조(술후관폐복막지복직기전초후절구예치항균미교선미봉합)190례,C조(술후피하방치인류관)171례。비교3조술후절구감염솔급절구이기청창봉합솔。결과:A조유11례절구감염,감염솔위7.69%;B조유4례절구감염,감염솔위2.11%;C조유3례절구감염,감염솔위1.75%。3조총체절구감염솔차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),B조화C조절구감염솔교A조저,차이유통계학의의(P<0.0167)。3조절구감염환자이기청창봉합솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론:Ⅲ류절구복부외과수술후예치항균미교선절구연기봉합급방치피하인류관적방법가이강저절구감염솔,단불능강저감염절구적이기청창봉합솔。
Objective To investigate the effect of placing subcutaneous drain tube and preseting triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 suture with delayed suturing to incision infection after typeⅢabdominal surgery. Methords Dividing 504 patients with typeⅢincisions undergone abdominal surgery into 3 groups. The number of group A patients with thoroughly incision washing and primary triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 suture after abdominal surgery was 143. The number of group B with closed anterior rectus sheath, opened skin and subcutaneous fat with preseted triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 suture was 190. The number of group C with subcutaneous drain tube after abdominal surgery was 171. We compared the incidence rates of incision infection and the second phase debridement suture rates among the 3 groups. Results For the group A, B, C, the number of incision infection people was 11, 4, 3 and the incision infection rate was 7.69%, 2.11%and 1.75%respectively. The difference of the 3 groups incision infection rate were statistically significant (P<0.05). The incision infection rate of the group B and group C were lower than that of group A and the difference were statistically significant (P<0.016 7). There were no significant differences in second phase debridement suture rates among the 3 groups. Conclusion Preseting triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 suture with delayed incision sutue and placing subcutaneous drain tube can decrease the incision infection rates for type Ⅲpatients after abdominal surgery, but can not decrease the second phase debridement suture rates of the infectious incision.