南方医科大学学报
南方醫科大學學報
남방의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2014年
4期
584-587
,共4页
邓永键%李东%胡勇华%陈君洋%褚庆军
鄧永鍵%李東%鬍勇華%陳君洋%褚慶軍
산영건%리동%호용화%진군양%저경군
卵泡刺激素%抑制素B%生精功能低下%精细胞成熟阻滞%唯支持细胞综合征%无精子症
卵泡刺激素%抑製素B%生精功能低下%精細胞成熟阻滯%唯支持細胞綜閤徵%無精子癥
란포자격소%억제소B%생정공능저하%정세포성숙조체%유지지세포종합정%무정자증
follicle-stimulating hormone%inhibin B%hypospermatogenesis%maturation arrest%Sertoli cell only%azoospermia
目的:联合检测育龄男性无精子患者血清卵泡刺激素(FSH)和抑制素B(INHB)水平评估睾丸生精功能的临床诊断价值。方法95例无精子症患者均行血清FSH、INHB检测,根据睾丸活检病理组织学分类,唯支持细胞综合征20例、生精低下25例、成熟阻滞18例和生精功能正常32例。统计分析FSH和INHB的血清水平与病理分类的相关性。结果血清FSH、INHB和INHB/FSH在唯支持细胞综合征组与其他组比较具有显著性差异(P<0.05),生精功能低下组、成熟阻滞组和生精功能正常组比较没有显著性差异(P>0.05);FSH、INHB和INHB/FSH与精细胞成熟阻滞无显著相关性(P>0.05),而在其他组别中均具有显著负相关性(P>0.05);INHB和INHB/FSH在所有研究组别中均具有显著性正相关(P<0.05);血清INHB小于28.55 pg/ml诊断唯支持细胞综合征的敏感度为97%,特异性为85%。结论血清FSH和INHB水平不能有效区分睾丸生精功能状态,但能有效确定唯支持细胞综合征,其他类型的生精功能异常仍需依赖活检病理组织学检查。
目的:聯閤檢測育齡男性無精子患者血清卵泡刺激素(FSH)和抑製素B(INHB)水平評估睪汍生精功能的臨床診斷價值。方法95例無精子癥患者均行血清FSH、INHB檢測,根據睪汍活檢病理組織學分類,唯支持細胞綜閤徵20例、生精低下25例、成熟阻滯18例和生精功能正常32例。統計分析FSH和INHB的血清水平與病理分類的相關性。結果血清FSH、INHB和INHB/FSH在唯支持細胞綜閤徵組與其他組比較具有顯著性差異(P<0.05),生精功能低下組、成熟阻滯組和生精功能正常組比較沒有顯著性差異(P>0.05);FSH、INHB和INHB/FSH與精細胞成熟阻滯無顯著相關性(P>0.05),而在其他組彆中均具有顯著負相關性(P>0.05);INHB和INHB/FSH在所有研究組彆中均具有顯著性正相關(P<0.05);血清INHB小于28.55 pg/ml診斷唯支持細胞綜閤徵的敏感度為97%,特異性為85%。結論血清FSH和INHB水平不能有效區分睪汍生精功能狀態,但能有效確定唯支持細胞綜閤徵,其他類型的生精功能異常仍需依賴活檢病理組織學檢查。
목적:연합검측육령남성무정자환자혈청란포자격소(FSH)화억제소B(INHB)수평평고고환생정공능적림상진단개치。방법95례무정자증환자균행혈청FSH、INHB검측,근거고환활검병리조직학분류,유지지세포종합정20례、생정저하25례、성숙조체18례화생정공능정상32례。통계분석FSH화INHB적혈청수평여병리분류적상관성。결과혈청FSH、INHB화INHB/FSH재유지지세포종합정조여기타조비교구유현저성차이(P<0.05),생정공능저하조、성숙조체조화생정공능정상조비교몰유현저성차이(P>0.05);FSH、INHB화INHB/FSH여정세포성숙조체무현저상관성(P>0.05),이재기타조별중균구유현저부상관성(P>0.05);INHB화INHB/FSH재소유연구조별중균구유현저성정상관(P<0.05);혈청INHB소우28.55 pg/ml진단유지지세포종합정적민감도위97%,특이성위85%。결론혈청FSH화INHB수평불능유효구분고환생정공능상태,단능유효학정유지지세포종합정,기타류형적생정공능이상잉수의뢰활검병리조직학검사。
Objective This study is in an attempt to evaluate the diagnostic significance to predict the spermatogenesis of azoospermic men in examination of serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) combinatiing with serum inhibin B (INHB). Methods Quantitative examination of serum FSH and INHB was performed in 95 case of azoospermic men. According to their classifications of testicular biopsy with histopathological examination, there were 20 patients of Sertoli cell only, 25 of hypospermatogenesis, 18 of spermatogenic maturation arrest (complete or incomplete), and 32 of normal spermatogenesis. The association of serum FSH and INHB levels with histopathological classifications were analyzed by using statistical software. Results Serum FSH, INHB and INHB/FSH levels of Sertoli cell only differed with statistical significance from hypospermatogenesis, spermatogenic maturation arrest and normal spermatogenesis (P<0.05). FSH, in which there were no statistical significance among the latter three classifications (P>0.05). Serum FSH, INHB and INHB/FSH levels were no relationship with maturation arrest (P>0.05), but were negatively related to the other classifications (P<0.05). INHB level less than 28.55 pg/ml predicted Sertoli cell only in a sensitivity of 97%and a specificity of 85%. Conclusion Serum FSH and INHB levels is ineffective to distinguish the spermatogenic classifications from azoospermic men, but they are available to confirm the disease of Sertoli cell only. The other abnormalities of azoospermic men is also dependent on bioptic histopathology to confirm the subtypes.