中国组织工程研究
中國組織工程研究
중국조직공정연구
Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
2014年
12期
1870-1876
,共7页
王洪%汤明%孟春庆%王寒琪%杨述华%杜靖远%段德宇%邵增务
王洪%湯明%孟春慶%王寒琪%楊述華%杜靖遠%段德宇%邵增務
왕홍%탕명%맹춘경%왕한기%양술화%두정원%단덕우%소증무
生物材料%材料相容性%复合支架材料%韧带组织工程%细胞种植方法%新鲜骨髓吸出物%体内%外生物相容性%复合生物型支架%湖北省自然科学基金
生物材料%材料相容性%複閤支架材料%韌帶組織工程%細胞種植方法%新鮮骨髓吸齣物%體內%外生物相容性%複閤生物型支架%湖北省自然科學基金
생물재료%재료상용성%복합지가재료%인대조직공정%세포충식방법%신선골수흡출물%체내%외생물상용성%복합생물형지가%호북성자연과학기금
biocompatible materials%stents%ligaments%bone marrow
背景:有关于应用新鲜骨髓吸出物直接局部注射修复韧带部分损伤的报道,少有提及应用新鲜骨髓吸出物直接种植于支架构建组织工程韧带的研究报道。<br> 目的:评价将新鲜骨髓吸出物直接种植于支架构建组织工程韧带的可行性。<br> 方法:构建丝素纤维/小肠黏膜下层复合支架后,骨髓种植组将骨髓吸出物直接种植于复合支架上;细胞种植组将骨髓间充质干细胞种植于复合支架上;以未接种任何物质的复合支架作为空白对照,检测各组细胞黏附密度、细胞增殖活性及细胞外基质分泌情况。将骨髓种植组复合物植入兔前交叉韧带横断处,12周后取材评价骨髓种植组材料体内生物相容性。<br> 结果与结论:骨髓种植组孵育4 h后的细胞黏附密度、不同时间点细胞增殖率显著高于细胞种植组(P<0.05)。骨髓种植组及细胞种植组Ⅰ型、Ⅲ型胶原分泌量均显著高于空白对照组(P<0.05),但骨髓种植组及细胞种植组两组间Ⅰ型、Ⅲ型胶原分泌量差异无显著性意义。骨髓种植组材料植入兔体内未引起致死性免疫排斥反应及严重炎症反应,未见明显韧带再生及血管化。说明新鲜骨髓吸出物直接种植于支架可构建组织工程韧带,并且体内短期生物相容性良好。
揹景:有關于應用新鮮骨髓吸齣物直接跼部註射脩複韌帶部分損傷的報道,少有提及應用新鮮骨髓吸齣物直接種植于支架構建組織工程韌帶的研究報道。<br> 目的:評價將新鮮骨髓吸齣物直接種植于支架構建組織工程韌帶的可行性。<br> 方法:構建絲素纖維/小腸黏膜下層複閤支架後,骨髓種植組將骨髓吸齣物直接種植于複閤支架上;細胞種植組將骨髓間充質榦細胞種植于複閤支架上;以未接種任何物質的複閤支架作為空白對照,檢測各組細胞黏附密度、細胞增殖活性及細胞外基質分泌情況。將骨髓種植組複閤物植入兔前交扠韌帶橫斷處,12週後取材評價骨髓種植組材料體內生物相容性。<br> 結果與結論:骨髓種植組孵育4 h後的細胞黏附密度、不同時間點細胞增殖率顯著高于細胞種植組(P<0.05)。骨髓種植組及細胞種植組Ⅰ型、Ⅲ型膠原分泌量均顯著高于空白對照組(P<0.05),但骨髓種植組及細胞種植組兩組間Ⅰ型、Ⅲ型膠原分泌量差異無顯著性意義。骨髓種植組材料植入兔體內未引起緻死性免疫排斥反應及嚴重炎癥反應,未見明顯韌帶再生及血管化。說明新鮮骨髓吸齣物直接種植于支架可構建組織工程韌帶,併且體內短期生物相容性良好。
배경:유관우응용신선골수흡출물직접국부주사수복인대부분손상적보도,소유제급응용신선골수흡출물직접충식우지가구건조직공정인대적연구보도。<br> 목적:평개장신선골수흡출물직접충식우지가구건조직공정인대적가행성。<br> 방법:구건사소섬유/소장점막하층복합지가후,골수충식조장골수흡출물직접충식우복합지가상;세포충식조장골수간충질간세포충식우복합지가상;이미접충임하물질적복합지가작위공백대조,검측각조세포점부밀도、세포증식활성급세포외기질분비정황。장골수충식조복합물식입토전교차인대횡단처,12주후취재평개골수충식조재료체내생물상용성。<br> 결과여결론:골수충식조부육4 h후적세포점부밀도、불동시간점세포증식솔현저고우세포충식조(P<0.05)。골수충식조급세포충식조Ⅰ형、Ⅲ형효원분비량균현저고우공백대조조(P<0.05),단골수충식조급세포충식조량조간Ⅰ형、Ⅲ형효원분비량차이무현저성의의。골수충식조재료식입토체내미인기치사성면역배척반응급엄중염증반응,미견명현인대재생급혈관화。설명신선골수흡출물직접충식우지가가구건조직공정인대,병차체내단기생물상용성량호。
BACKGROUND:There are several reports about the application of fresh bone marrow aspirate being injected directly to repair partial ligament injury, but the application about fresh bone marrow aspirate directly being planted on scaffolds to build tissue-engineered ligament is rarely mentioned. <br> OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the feasibility of applying fresh bone marrow aspirate planted directly on scaffolds to construct tissue-engineered ligament <br> METHODS:We constructed fibroin fiber/smal intestinal submucosa composite scaffold, then planting fresh bone marrow directly to built bone marrow seeding group and planting seed cel s (bone marrow mesenchymal stem cel s) on the scaffold to built cel seeding group. The control group had no treatment. After that, we detected the density of cel adhesion, cel proliferation ability and extracel ular matrix secretion. Then, the composite in the bone marrow seeding group was implanted into the broken anterior cruciate ligament in rabbits, and material biocompatibility in vivo was evaluated after 12 weeks. <br> RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:After 4 hours of incubation, bone marrow seeding group was significantly higher than the cel seeding group in cel adhesion density and proliferation rate (P<0.05). Bone marrow seeding group and cel seeding group showed higher type I, III col agen secretion compared with the control group (P<0.05), but the col agen secretion of bone marrow seeding group and cel seeding group showed no significant difference. Composite cel scaffold implantation in vivo did not cause fatal immune rejection and severe inflammatory reaction, and no significant ligament regeneration and vascularization occurred. These findings indicate that fresh bone marrow aspirate can be seeded directly on scaffolds to construct tissue-engineered ligament, and the short-term biocompatibility in vivo is good.