CAJ | 학술논문

为分析日光温室地源热泵供暖的碳足迹，该文以日光温室地源热泵供暖系统中浅层地热能的存储、提取、制冷压缩提升和温室末端供暖整个过程为研究对象，对系统的温室气体排放和单位温室供暖面积的排放水平进行分析，构建基于生命周期分析LCA（life cycle assessment）的日光温室地源热泵供暖碳足迹分析方法。同时以北京地区日光温室地源热泵系统冬季供暖采集的试验数据为依据，分析和计算出北京地区日光温室在采用燃煤和燃气2种不同发电方式下地源热泵系统的供暖碳足迹和基于20 a和100 a温室地源热泵供暖碳足迹的全球变化潜能（global warming potential，GWP，单位为二氧化碳当量排放-CO2-eq.）的变化。研究表明，在北京地区采用燃煤和燃气驱动地源热泵系统的碳足迹GWP分别为257和72 g/(m2·d)。基于100 a的GWP总量比20 a的计算值分别减少了1.6%和5.4%。对比荷兰Venlo型温室天然气供暖，该研究中采用燃煤发电驱动日光温室地源热泵供暖的碳足迹是其1.39倍，而燃气发电驱动日光温室地源热泵供暖的碳足迹仅为Venlo型温室供暖的41%。采用燃气发电驱动的地源热泵供暖系统具有更低的碳足迹。
위분석일광온실지원열빙공난적탄족적，해문이일광온실지원열빙공난계통중천층지열능적존저、제취、제냉압축제승화온실말단공난정개과정위연구대상，대계통적온실기체배방화단위온실공난면적적배방수평진행분석，구건기우생명주기분석LCA（life cycle assessment）적일광온실지원열빙공난탄족적분석방법。동시이북경지구일광온실지원열빙계통동계공난채집적시험수거위의거，분석화계산출북경지구일광온실재채용연매화연기2충불동발전방식하지원열빙계통적공난탄족적화기우20 a화100 a온실지원열빙공난탄족적적전구변화잠능（global warming potential，GWP，단위위이양화탄당량배방-CO2-eq.）적변화。연구표명，재북경지구채용연매화연기구동지원열빙계통적탄족적GWP분별위257화72 g/(m2·d)。기우100 a적GWP총량비20 a적계산치분별감소료1.6%화5.4%。대비하란Venlo형온실천연기공난，해연구중채용연매발전구동일광온실지원열빙공난적탄족적시기1.39배，이연기발전구동일광온실지원열빙공난적탄족적부위Venlo형온실공난적41%。채용연기발전구동적지원열빙공난계통구유경저적탄족적。
The Chinese solar greenhouse, characterized by east-west orientation, a transparent camber south roof, and a solid north roof and east and west walls, is utilized primarily in horticulture in northern China. This design of greenhouse can keep the sheltering plants from freezing in winter because of the“greenhouse effect”. However, the healthy growing of plants still needs assisted heating especially during winter nights. The coal-fired heating system (CFHs) and the natural gas-fired heating system (GFHs) both have been widely applied to heat greenhouses. However, the conventional fossil energy sources, such as coal and natural gas, are non-renewable and are the major greenhouse gas (GHG) contributors. The overusing of fossil fuel in agricultural production has been directly or indirectly related to the global climate change, environmental pollution, and energy crisis. Therefore, renewable and clean energy, such as solar, geothermal, and shallow geothermal has been increasingly applied for greenhouse heating or cooling across the world. Ground source heat pump (GSHP) technology has dual functions in heating and cooling. It is one of the most rapidly growing green technologies for heating and air-conditioning in recent years. The GSHP application for solar greenhouse heating has proven to have a high primary energy ratio or coefficient of performance (COP) in previously studies. However, the environmental performance of the GSHP in heating solar greenhouse, such as its carbon footprint, is still unknown. Systematic and long-term study of the specific GSHP greenhouse-heating was required to evaluate its carbon footprint based on life cycle assessment (LCA) method. The GSHP in a Chinese solar greenhouse was studied to evaluate its environmental performance in greenhouse heating. The environmental performance of the GSHP was analyzed based on the field test data and the performance analysis models that were developed in this study. According to the study, in a 480 m2 Chinese solar greenhouse during the winter heating period, the GSHP demonstrated stable heating effects. The shallow geothermal energy utilized by the GSHP, in the processes of energy storage, extraction, enhancement of refrigeration compression cycles, and greenhouse heating, were studied to analyze the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission inventory and emission levels based on per square meter of the greenhouse floor. An analysis method based on LCA was developed for estimating the carbon footprint of Chinese solar greenhouse heating with GSHPs in this study, the carbon footprints of a GSHP greenhouse heating system operating on coal fired power and gas fired power were analyzed and calculated according to the data collected from a solar greenhouse heated in the Beijing area. Meanwhile, the variation of global warming potential (GWP, CO2 emission equivalent or CO2-eq) of GSHP in heating a Chinese solar greenhouse from 20 to 100 a were analyzed. The GWP of GSHP greenhouse heating operating on coal fired power and gas fired power were 257 g/(m2·d) and 72 g/(m2·d). Meanwhile, the total GWP of 100a is reduced by 1.6% and 5.4% from the calculation of 20 a. Comparing the carbon footprints between solar greenhouse heating with GSHP and Venlo greenhouse heating with natural gas, the carbon footprint of solar greenhouse GSHP heating was 39% more than that of Venlo greenhouse heating when GSHPs was operating on coal fired power, but the carbon footprint of solar greenhouse heating will be only 41%of Venlo greenhouse heating when GSHPs were operating on gas fired power. The GSHP heating test was focused on a Chinese solar greenhouse in this study to estimate the environmental performance; however, the carbon footprint calculation and analysis methods are applicable to different styles of multi-span greenhouse GSHP heating analysis.