中国人兽共患病学报
中國人獸共患病學報
중국인수공환병학보
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ZOONOSES
2014年
10期
1045-1047,1051
,共4页
赵娜%赵赤鸿%荣蓉%肖培%孙岩%王娜%崔步云
趙娜%趙赤鴻%榮蓉%肖培%孫巖%王娜%崔步雲
조나%조적홍%영용%초배%손암%왕나%최보운
布鲁氏菌病%诊断%Brucellacapt%iELISA
佈魯氏菌病%診斷%Brucellacapt%iELISA
포로씨균병%진단%Brucellacapt%iELISA
brucellosis%diagnosis%Brucellacapt%iELISA
目的:探索Brucellacapt方法对于我国布鲁氏菌病的诊断价值。方法对来门诊就诊的120例就诊者,使用RB-PT和SAT方法结合临床表现等诊断布鲁氏菌病病人75例,非布鲁氏菌病病人45例。对全部120份就诊者血清进行Bru-cellacapt和iELISA检测并比较分析其在诊断中的意义。结果 Brucellacapt检测方法的灵敏度、特异度、符合率、Kappa值和ROC曲线下面积分别为82.7%、88.9%、85.0%、0.69、0.86,而iELISA方法的结果分别为90.7%、64.4%、80.8%、0.57、0.78。结论 Brucellacapt检测方法的特异度、符合率、Kappa值和ROC曲线下面积均高于iELISA检测方法,而iELISA检测方法的灵敏度较高。
目的:探索Brucellacapt方法對于我國佈魯氏菌病的診斷價值。方法對來門診就診的120例就診者,使用RB-PT和SAT方法結閤臨床錶現等診斷佈魯氏菌病病人75例,非佈魯氏菌病病人45例。對全部120份就診者血清進行Bru-cellacapt和iELISA檢測併比較分析其在診斷中的意義。結果 Brucellacapt檢測方法的靈敏度、特異度、符閤率、Kappa值和ROC麯線下麵積分彆為82.7%、88.9%、85.0%、0.69、0.86,而iELISA方法的結果分彆為90.7%、64.4%、80.8%、0.57、0.78。結論 Brucellacapt檢測方法的特異度、符閤率、Kappa值和ROC麯線下麵積均高于iELISA檢測方法,而iELISA檢測方法的靈敏度較高。
목적:탐색Brucellacapt방법대우아국포로씨균병적진단개치。방법대래문진취진적120례취진자,사용RB-PT화SAT방법결합림상표현등진단포로씨균병병인75례,비포로씨균병병인45례。대전부120빈취진자혈청진행Bru-cellacapt화iELISA검측병비교분석기재진단중적의의。결과 Brucellacapt검측방법적령민도、특이도、부합솔、Kappa치화ROC곡선하면적분별위82.7%、88.9%、85.0%、0.69、0.86,이iELISA방법적결과분별위90.7%、64.4%、80.8%、0.57、0.78。결론 Brucellacapt검측방법적특이도、부합솔、Kappa치화ROC곡선하면적균고우iELISA검측방법,이iELISA검측방법적령민도교고。
Brucellacapt is a new serological test based on immunocapture-agglutination technique that has been used in many countries ,but there was no related article reported in China .The value of the Brucellacapt method in diagnosing human brucellosis was evaluated in this study .Among 120 suspected patients ,75 patients and 45 negatives were diagnosed by SAT and RBPT method combination with their clinical symptoms .Sera from all 120 people were tested by the method of Brucella-capt and iELISA ,and the results were ,consequently ,analyzed and compared .It showed that sensitivity ,specificity ,consis-tency rate ,Kappa value ,and area under ROC curve were found to be 82 .7% ,88 .9% ,85 .0% ,0 .69 ,and 0 .86 ,respectively for Brucellacapt ,whereas they were found to be 90 .7% ,64 .4% ,80 .8% ,0 .57 ,and 0 .78 for iELISA .In conclusion ,specific-ity ,consistency rate ,Kappa value ,and area under ROC curve were higher in Brucellacapt method than that in iELISA .How-ever ,the sensitivity of iELISA is higher .