CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较热敏腧穴穴位敷贴与传统腧穴穴位敷贴治疗支气管哮喘（慢性持续期）患者的疗效差异。方法：40例支气管哮喘（慢性持续期）患者随机分为热敏腧穴穴位敷贴试验组（以下简称试验组）和传统腧穴敷贴对照组（以下简称对照组）各20例，于夏季三伏天进行敷贴治疗，敷药时间为4h，1次/10d，3次为一疗程，共治疗一疗程。于治疗前与治疗后3个月进行疗效比较。结果：试验组有效率为85％，对照组有效率为55％，与对照组相比，试验组疗效差异有统计学意义（ P＜0．05）。结论：治疗支气管哮喘（慢性持续期）患者热敏腧穴穴位敷贴疗法优于常规腧穴穴位敷贴疗法。
목적：비교열민수혈혈위부첩여전통수혈혈위부첩치료지기관효천（만성지속기）환자적료효차이。방법：40례지기관효천（만성지속기）환자수궤분위열민수혈혈위부첩시험조（이하간칭시험조）화전통수혈부첩대조조（이하간칭대조조）각20례，우하계삼복천진행부첩치료，부약시간위4h，1차/10d，3차위일료정，공치료일료정。우치료전여치료후3개월진행료효비교。결과：시험조유효솔위85％，대조조유효솔위55％，여대조조상비，시험조료효차이유통계학의의（ P＜0．05）。결론：치료지기관효천（만성지속기）환자열민수혈혈위부첩요법우우상규수혈혈위부첩요법。
Objective:To compare the efficacy differences between the therapy of heat -sensitive acupoint application and traditional acu-point application in treating bronchial asthma at chronic persistent period .Methods:Forty patients who with bronchial asthma at chron-ic persistent period were randomly divided into heat -sensitive acupoint application experimental group ( experimental group ) and tradi-tional acupoint application control group ( control group ) and each group had twenty patients .The treatment carried in dog days of sum-mer and each time is 4 hours, every 10 days once and 3 consecutive treating as a therapeutic course .The efficacy comparison is be-tween before treatment and 3 months after treatment .Results:The effective rate was 85%in the experimental group and 55%in con-trol group.Compared with control group, there was a statistical significance in effect in experimental group (P<0.05).Conclusion:The therapeutic effect of heat -sensitive acupoint application therapy for bronchial asthma at chronic persistent period is superior to tra -ditional acupoint application therapy .