CAJ | 학술논문

顾城和海子分属于当代不同时期的诗歌派别，但同为20世纪80年代的诗人，并最终在相近的时间走向死亡。这种巧合为探讨顾城与海子的诗歌提供了某种线索。论文将从比较顾城和海子的自然观出发，以二者诗歌中出现频率较多的春天意象为例，来分析二人诗歌中的悲剧意识。最后简要分析顾城和海子的诗歌风格，勾画出二人诗歌中的对立的主体形象，进一步探求顾城和海子诗歌中的死亡预言。
고성화해자분속우당대불동시기적시가파별，단동위20세기80년대적시인，병최종재상근적시간주향사망。저충교합위탐토고성여해자적시가제공료모충선색。논문장종비교고성화해자적자연관출발，이이자시가중출현빈솔교다적춘천의상위례，래분석이인시가중적비극의식。최후간요분석고성화해자적시가풍격，구화출이인시가중적대립적주체형상，진일보탐구고성화해자시가중적사망예언。
Gu Cheng and Hai Zi are different poets who belong to different periods of contemporary poetry, but eventually they died at a similar time (1980s):Hai Zi killed himself on the rail way on March 26 ,1989;Gu Cheng suicided,after murdered his wife on October 8, 1993, in New Zealand .In order to investigate this coincidence their poetry provides some clues. This article makes comparisons between Gu Cheng and Hai Zi ,such as view of nature, spring imagery,analyzing the two poems tragic consciousness. Finally,it analyzes Gu Cheng and Hai Zi's poetry style,then lays out the main image of two poetry opposition to further explore death prophecy.