CAJ | 학술논문

以宗族调解为主的传统农村社会纠纷解决方式与转型时期农村社会纠纷解决方式有一定的差异。通过比较转型期农村社会多元化解决机制中的具体方式--诉讼与非诉讼方式，可以看出它们各有优劣，但在运作过程中却不相协调。为了解决这一问题，可以从法治与自治的关系出发，一方面，实现诉讼方式与非诉讼方式的协调统一，必须要处理好法治与自治中司法权与当事人自治权的关系；另一方面，要使非诉方式在法治框架内得以有效运行，要尽量协调好法治与民间自治相对应主要依据国家法与民间法的关系。
이종족조해위주적전통농촌사회규분해결방식여전형시기농촌사회규분해결방식유일정적차이。통과비교전형기농촌사회다원화해결궤제중적구체방식--소송여비소송방식，가이간출타문각유우렬，단재운작과정중각불상협조。위료해결저일문제，가이종법치여자치적관계출발，일방면，실현소송방식여비소송방식적협조통일，필수요처리호법치여자치중사법권여당사인자치권적관계；령일방면，요사비소방식재법치광가내득이유효운행，요진량협조호법치여민간자치상대응주요의거국가법여민간법적관계。
The traditional way is the clan,which has some differences with the resolution of rural social dispute in the transition period. However,by comparing the transition in the diversification of rural social settlement mechanism- litigation and non-litigation way, we can see that they both have advantages and disadvantages. But they can’t work well with each other.To solve the problem, let us compare the relationship between the rule of law and autonomy, we can find the distinctions. on the one hand, to achieve the harmonization of litigation and non-litigation,we must handle the relationship between jurisdiction and party autonomy right in the rule of law and autonomy; On the other hand, to make the non- litigation way operates effectively within the framework of the rule of law, we should try to reconcile the relationship between national law and folk law.