CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察3M Adper Prompt自酸蚀黏结剂和Gluma脱敏剂治疗牙本质过敏症的临床疗效。方法洁牙术后确诊为牙本质敏感症的116例232颗牙采取自身配对设计分为2组，试验组用3M Adper Prompt自酸蚀粘结剂脱敏治疗，对照组用Gluma脱敏剂进行脱敏治疗，在统一的疗效标准下进行即刻、1个月的疗效比较。结果即刻疗效比较二者无显著性差异。而一个月3M Adper Prompt自酸蚀黏结剂的疗效明显优于Gluma脱敏剂。结论3M Adper Prompt是一种比较理想的脱敏剂。
목적：관찰3M Adper Prompt자산식점결제화Gluma탈민제치료아본질과민증적림상료효。방법길아술후학진위아본질민감증적116례232과아채취자신배대설계분위2조，시험조용3M Adper Prompt자산식점결제탈민치료，대조조용Gluma탈민제진행탈민치료，재통일적료효표준하진행즉각、1개월적료효비교。결과즉각료효비교이자무현저성차이。이일개월3M Adper Prompt자산식점결제적료효명현우우Gluma탈민제。결론3M Adper Prompt시일충비교이상적탈민제。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacies of 3M Adper Prompt self-etch adhesive and Gluma desensitizer in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Methods A total of 116 patients with dentine hypersensitivity (232 teeth) were treated with 3M Adper Prompt self-etch adhesive (experimental group) or Gluma desensitizer (control group). The curative efficacy was compared between the two groups immediately and 1 month after treatment. Results There was not significant difference in the curative efficacy between the two groups immediately after treatment. However, the efficacy of 3M Adper Prompt self-etch adhesive was obviously better than that of Gluma desensitizer 1 month after treatment. Conclusion The 3M Adper Prompt self-etch adhesive is an ideal desensitizer for dentine hypersensitivity.