国际眼科杂志
國際眼科雜誌
국제안과잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
2014年
8期
1476-1477
,共2页
优势眼%屈光参差%卡洞法%Worth四点法
優勢眼%屈光參差%卡洞法%Worth四點法
우세안%굴광삼차%잡동법%Worth사점법
ocular domiance%anisometropia%hole-in-the-card test%Worth 4 dot test
目的：研究优势眼眼别与其两眼中近视性屈光程度较大眼的眼别关系,并分别研究Worth四点法测量优势眼与卡洞法测量优势眼的相关性。<br> 方法：选取125例受试者,按照双眼屈光参差的程度分为生理性屈光参差组与病理性屈光参差组。在医学验光基础上分别运用Worth四点法及卡洞法判别双眼中优势眼的眼别。<br> 结果：(1)生理性屈光参差组(卡洞法)优势眼眼别与双眼中近视性屈光程度较大眼眼别显著相关( Z=-4.057,P<0.01)；Worth四点法优势眼眼别与双眼中近视性屈光程度较大眼眼别显著相关(Z=-3.558, P<0.01)；而病理性屈光参差组,两种方法所测均无显著相关(P>0.05)。(2)Worth四点法和卡洞法测得的优势眼眼别差异无显著性(n=125, P>0.05)。<br> 结论：优势眼由基因决定或幼年时期形成并持续维持,而近视性屈光参差可能影响优势眼的选择。优势眼的测量中Worth四点法具有一定的参考意义。
目的：研究優勢眼眼彆與其兩眼中近視性屈光程度較大眼的眼彆關繫,併分彆研究Worth四點法測量優勢眼與卡洞法測量優勢眼的相關性。<br> 方法：選取125例受試者,按照雙眼屈光參差的程度分為生理性屈光參差組與病理性屈光參差組。在醫學驗光基礎上分彆運用Worth四點法及卡洞法判彆雙眼中優勢眼的眼彆。<br> 結果：(1)生理性屈光參差組(卡洞法)優勢眼眼彆與雙眼中近視性屈光程度較大眼眼彆顯著相關( Z=-4.057,P<0.01)；Worth四點法優勢眼眼彆與雙眼中近視性屈光程度較大眼眼彆顯著相關(Z=-3.558, P<0.01)；而病理性屈光參差組,兩種方法所測均無顯著相關(P>0.05)。(2)Worth四點法和卡洞法測得的優勢眼眼彆差異無顯著性(n=125, P>0.05)。<br> 結論：優勢眼由基因決定或幼年時期形成併持續維持,而近視性屈光參差可能影響優勢眼的選擇。優勢眼的測量中Worth四點法具有一定的參攷意義。
목적：연구우세안안별여기량안중근시성굴광정도교대안적안별관계,병분별연구Worth사점법측량우세안여잡동법측량우세안적상관성。<br> 방법：선취125례수시자,안조쌍안굴광삼차적정도분위생이성굴광삼차조여병이성굴광삼차조。재의학험광기출상분별운용Worth사점법급잡동법판별쌍안중우세안적안별。<br> 결과：(1)생이성굴광삼차조(잡동법)우세안안별여쌍안중근시성굴광정도교대안안별현저상관( Z=-4.057,P<0.01)；Worth사점법우세안안별여쌍안중근시성굴광정도교대안안별현저상관(Z=-3.558, P<0.01)；이병이성굴광삼차조,량충방법소측균무현저상관(P>0.05)。(2)Worth사점법화잡동법측득적우세안안별차이무현저성(n=125, P>0.05)。<br> 결론：우세안유기인결정혹유년시기형성병지속유지,이근시성굴광삼차가능영향우세안적선택。우세안적측량중Worth사점법구유일정적삼고의의。
ATM: To investigate the relationship between the oculus dominans and the eye with higher diopter among myopes, and to study the difference between the Worth 4 dot test and hole-in-the-card test. <br> METHODS: Totally 125 cases were divided into two groups as physiogenic anisometropic group and pathological anisomitropic group according to the degree of binoculus anisometropy. Worth 4 dot test and hole-in-the-card test were used to distinguish oculus dominans respectively based on medical optometry. <br> RESULTS: In physiogenic anisometropic group, the oculus dominans and the eye with higher diopter among myopes had significant relationship by hole-in-the-card test (Z = -4. 057, P<0. 01) and Worth 4 dot test (Z=-3. 558, P<0. 01). However, in pathological group, No statistical significance was between two tests (P>0. 05); distinguish the oculus dominans had no statistically significant difference between the Worth 4 dot test and hole-in-the-card test (n=125, P>0. 05). <br> CONCLUSION:The oculus dominans is determined by gene or formed during juvenile period, then myopia anisometropic may affect the choice of that. The Worth 4 dot test has some reference significance for observing oculus dominans.
