CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对鹰嘴钢板与克氏针张力带在尺骨鹰嘴骨折治疗中的应用进行比较分析。方法：选取2007年3月～2013年3月间的尺骨鹰嘴骨折患者104例，随机分为张力带组和鹰嘴钢板组，给予相应的固定治疗。并且对两组患者的临床治疗效果进行比较分析。结果：张力带组中患者的疾病治疗优良率为90.39%，而鹰嘴钢板组中患者的疾病治疗优良率为94.23%，即两组尺骨鹰嘴骨折患者在进行相应的疾病治疗后疾病情况均有一定的改善，且两组患者的临床疗效无显著差异，P＞0.05。结论：对尺骨鹰嘴骨折患者进行疾病治疗时采取鹰嘴钢板与克氏针张力带固定的临床疗效无显著差异，均有临床疗效，值得积极临床推广。
목적：대응취강판여극씨침장력대재척골응취골절치료중적응용진행비교분석。방법：선취2007년3월～2013년3월간적척골응취골절환자104례，수궤분위장력대조화응취강판조，급여상응적고정치료。병차대량조환자적림상치료효과진행비교분석。결과：장력대조중환자적질병치료우량솔위90.39%，이응취강판조중환자적질병치료우량솔위94.23%，즉량조척골응취골절환자재진행상응적질병치료후질병정황균유일정적개선，차량조환자적림상료효무현저차이，P＞0.05。결론：대척골응취골절환자진행질병치료시채취응취강판여극씨침장력대고정적림상료효무현저차이，균유림상료효，치득적겁림상추엄。
Objective:To analyze and compare the application of olecranon plate and Kirschner wire tension band in the treatment of ulna olecranon fracture. Methods:104 patients with ulna olecranon fracture from March 2007 to March 2013 were randomized into two groups. One group was treated with Kirschner wire tension band and the other with olecranon plate. The two groups were given corresponding fixation and the clinical curative efficacy were compared and analyzed. Result: the recovery rate of the Kirschner wire tension band group was 90.39%and that of the olecranon plate group was 94.23%, which indicated the condition of both the two groups improved after the treatment and there was no significant different between the curative efficacy of the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion:In the treatment of olecranon fracture, there is no significant difference between the curative efficacy of olecranon plate and Kirschner wire tension band. Both of the two methods have clinical curative efficacy and they are worthy of being promoted.