中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2014年
21期
220-221
,共2页
腹腔镜术%泌尿外科%疗效
腹腔鏡術%泌尿外科%療效
복강경술%비뇨외과%료효
Laparoscopic surgery%The uropoiesis surgical department%The curative effect
目的:探讨在泌尿外科疾病的治疗过程中应用腹腔镜术的临床疗效。方法以2012年2月至2013年5月在我院泌尿外科进行治疗的128例患者为研究对象,随机将这些患者分为两组,观察组患者行腹腔镜手术,对照组患者行开腹手术,治疗结束后比较两组的具体疗效。结果观察组的平均手术时间为(163.4±30.22)min,对照组为(254.9±43.10)min;观察组的平均出血量为(90.3±12.6)mL,对照组为(156.4±20.3)mL;观察组的平均住院时间为(6.4±2.6)d,对照组为(14.4±7.6)d,以上组间比较均有显著差异,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。手术并发症的发生率也与对照组有明显差异,也具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于泌尿外科疾病患者来说,选择腹腔镜术进行治疗可以获得比较好的疗效,康复时间较短,给患者带来的创伤也小,具有良好的应用前景。
目的:探討在泌尿外科疾病的治療過程中應用腹腔鏡術的臨床療效。方法以2012年2月至2013年5月在我院泌尿外科進行治療的128例患者為研究對象,隨機將這些患者分為兩組,觀察組患者行腹腔鏡手術,對照組患者行開腹手術,治療結束後比較兩組的具體療效。結果觀察組的平均手術時間為(163.4±30.22)min,對照組為(254.9±43.10)min;觀察組的平均齣血量為(90.3±12.6)mL,對照組為(156.4±20.3)mL;觀察組的平均住院時間為(6.4±2.6)d,對照組為(14.4±7.6)d,以上組間比較均有顯著差異,具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。手術併髮癥的髮生率也與對照組有明顯差異,也具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論對于泌尿外科疾病患者來說,選擇腹腔鏡術進行治療可以穫得比較好的療效,康複時間較短,給患者帶來的創傷也小,具有良好的應用前景。
목적:탐토재비뇨외과질병적치료과정중응용복강경술적림상료효。방법이2012년2월지2013년5월재아원비뇨외과진행치료적128례환자위연구대상,수궤장저사환자분위량조,관찰조환자행복강경수술,대조조환자행개복수술,치료결속후비교량조적구체료효。결과관찰조적평균수술시간위(163.4±30.22)min,대조조위(254.9±43.10)min;관찰조적평균출혈량위(90.3±12.6)mL,대조조위(156.4±20.3)mL;관찰조적평균주원시간위(6.4±2.6)d,대조조위(14.4±7.6)d,이상조간비교균유현저차이,구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。수술병발증적발생솔야여대조조유명현차이,야구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론대우비뇨외과질병환자래설,선택복강경술진행치료가이획득비교호적료효,강복시간교단,급환자대래적창상야소,구유량호적응용전경。
Objective To discuss the application of laparoscopic surgery in urology disease treatment process of the clinical curative effect. Methods From February 2012 to May 2013 in our hospital uropoiesis surgical department for treatment of 128 patients as the research object, and random to these patients. Divided into two groups, the observation group of laparoscopic surgery, the control line open operation, the specific efficacy of comparing two groups after treatment. Results Observation group average operation time was (163.4±30.22) min, the control group (254.9±43.10) min;observation group the mean blood loss was (90.3±12.6)mL, the control group (156.4±20.3) mL;observation group the average hospitalization time was (6.4±2.6) d, the control group (14.4 ±7.6) d, comparison between the above group were significant differences, statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of complications and has obvious difference with control group, also has statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion For urology disease patients, select the laparoscopic treatment can obtain good curative effect, short recovery time, bring to patients with trauma is small, has a good application prospect.