中外医学研究
中外醫學研究
중외의학연구
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
2014年
21期
129-130
,共2页
PPH%传统手术%重度痔疮
PPH%傳統手術%重度痔瘡
PPH%전통수술%중도치창
PPH%Traditional surgery%Severe hemorrhoids
目的：对比PPH和传统手术治疗重度痔疮的疗效。方法：收集2008年3月-2012年7月笔者所在医院行PPH治疗的重度痔疮患者68例；传统手术组选取同时期行传统手术方法的重度痔疮患者48例，对两组的治疗有效率、并发症、随访结果等进行对比分析。结果：PPH组手术时间、住院时间、恢复时间分别为(15.3±2.5)min、(3.7±1.4)d、(7.6±4.3)d明显少于传统手术组的(37.0±3.4)min、(6.8±2.3)d、(31.6±10.3)d，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)；PPH组并发症发病率少于传统手术组，1年后随访结果总有效率要好于传统手术组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：PPH手术比传统手术治疗重度痔疮治疗效果好，值得临床推广应用。
目的：對比PPH和傳統手術治療重度痔瘡的療效。方法：收集2008年3月-2012年7月筆者所在醫院行PPH治療的重度痔瘡患者68例；傳統手術組選取同時期行傳統手術方法的重度痔瘡患者48例，對兩組的治療有效率、併髮癥、隨訪結果等進行對比分析。結果：PPH組手術時間、住院時間、恢複時間分彆為(15.3±2.5)min、(3.7±1.4)d、(7.6±4.3)d明顯少于傳統手術組的(37.0±3.4)min、(6.8±2.3)d、(31.6±10.3)d，差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)；PPH組併髮癥髮病率少于傳統手術組，1年後隨訪結果總有效率要好于傳統手術組，差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論：PPH手術比傳統手術治療重度痔瘡治療效果好，值得臨床推廣應用。
목적：대비PPH화전통수술치료중도치창적료효。방법：수집2008년3월-2012년7월필자소재의원행PPH치료적중도치창환자68례；전통수술조선취동시기행전통수술방법적중도치창환자48례，대량조적치료유효솔、병발증、수방결과등진행대비분석。결과：PPH조수술시간、주원시간、회복시간분별위(15.3±2.5)min、(3.7±1.4)d、(7.6±4.3)d명현소우전통수술조적(37.0±3.4)min、(6.8±2.3)d、(31.6±10.3)d，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)；PPH조병발증발병솔소우전통수술조，1년후수방결과총유효솔요호우전통수술조，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론：PPH수술비전통수술치료중도치창치료효과호，치득림상추엄응용。
Objective:To compare the curative effect of PPH and traditional surgical in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids.Method:68 cases of severe hemorrhoids from March 2008 to July 2012 in our line in the treatment of PPH were collected,48 cases of severe hemorrhoids were selected at the same time in the treatment of the traditional surgical method as traditional surgery group.Two groups of efficient,complications and follow-up results were analyzed.Result:The operation time,length of hospital stay,recovery time in the PPH group respectively (15.3±2.5)min,(3.7±1.4)d,(7.6±4.3)d,they were significantly less than traditional surgery group (37.0±3.4)min,(6.8±2.3)d,(31.6±10.3)d,there had significant difference(P<0.05).Complications incidence of PPH group was less than traditional surgery group,after a year of follow-up the total effect was significantly better than traditional surgery group,the difference were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The treatment effect of PPH surgery is better than traditional surgery in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids,it is worthy of clinical popularization and application.
