中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2014年
21期
61-62
,共2页
儿科呼吸道疾病%治疗方案%合理性
兒科呼吸道疾病%治療方案%閤理性
인과호흡도질병%치료방안%합이성
Pediatric respiratory diseases%Treatment%Rationality
目的：分析秋季儿科门诊治疗呼吸道疾病的治疗方案是否具合理性。方法抽取连续12 d的门诊儿科处方进行所用药物的统计学处理，以判断所选药间的相关性。结果治疗上感组与治疗支气管炎组所选药物间无显著性差异（P＞0.05）；抗菌治疗的同时也抗病毒治疗。结论二者的治疗方案相同，但不具合理性。
目的：分析鞦季兒科門診治療呼吸道疾病的治療方案是否具閤理性。方法抽取連續12 d的門診兒科處方進行所用藥物的統計學處理，以判斷所選藥間的相關性。結果治療上感組與治療支氣管炎組所選藥物間無顯著性差異（P＞0.05）；抗菌治療的同時也抗病毒治療。結論二者的治療方案相同，但不具閤理性。
목적：분석추계인과문진치료호흡도질병적치료방안시부구합이성。방법추취련속12 d적문진인과처방진행소용약물적통계학처리，이판단소선약간적상관성。결과치료상감조여치료지기관염조소선약물간무현저성차이（P＞0.05）；항균치료적동시야항병독치료。결론이자적치료방안상동，단불구합이성。
Objective To analyze the autumn pediatric outpatient treatment whether has the rationality for the treatment of respiratory diseases. Methods 12 consecutive days of outpatient pediatric prescription drugs used in statistical processing, to determine the correlation among the selected drugs. Results The sense of treatment group and the treatment of bronchitis, there was no significant difference between the selected drugs(P>0.05);antibacterial and antiviral treatment of treatment. Conclusion Both treatments are the same, but do not have rationality.
