中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2014年
21期
8-9
,共2页
昏迷%病因%预后%急救
昏迷%病因%預後%急救
혼미%병인%예후%급구
Coma%Etiology%Prognosis%First aid
目的:探讨根据病因实施救治对昏迷患者预后的影响。方法选择我院2011年11月至2013年11月期间收治的昏迷病例共98例,上述患者分为观察组和对照组。对照组患者在施救过程中根据临床症状进行救治,观察组在救治过程中根据导致昏迷的相关病因针对性治疗。观察两组患者救治成功情况。结果观察组患者经过病因抢救后:好转28例、治愈23例、死亡9例,抢救成功患者共51例,抢救成功所占比例为85.0%;对照组患者根据症状抢救后:好转17例、治愈9例、死亡12例,抢救成功患者共26例,抢救成功所占比例为68.4%;观察组抢救成功所占比例高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论根据病因进行救治能够显著提高昏迷患者抢救效果,值得借鉴。
目的:探討根據病因實施救治對昏迷患者預後的影響。方法選擇我院2011年11月至2013年11月期間收治的昏迷病例共98例,上述患者分為觀察組和對照組。對照組患者在施救過程中根據臨床癥狀進行救治,觀察組在救治過程中根據導緻昏迷的相關病因針對性治療。觀察兩組患者救治成功情況。結果觀察組患者經過病因搶救後:好轉28例、治愈23例、死亡9例,搶救成功患者共51例,搶救成功所佔比例為85.0%;對照組患者根據癥狀搶救後:好轉17例、治愈9例、死亡12例,搶救成功患者共26例,搶救成功所佔比例為68.4%;觀察組搶救成功所佔比例高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論根據病因進行救治能夠顯著提高昏迷患者搶救效果,值得藉鑒。
목적:탐토근거병인실시구치대혼미환자예후적영향。방법선택아원2011년11월지2013년11월기간수치적혼미병례공98례,상술환자분위관찰조화대조조。대조조환자재시구과정중근거림상증상진행구치,관찰조재구치과정중근거도치혼미적상관병인침대성치료。관찰량조환자구치성공정황。결과관찰조환자경과병인창구후:호전28례、치유23례、사망9례,창구성공환자공51례,창구성공소점비례위85.0%;대조조환자근거증상창구후:호전17례、치유9례、사망12례,창구성공환자공26례,창구성공소점비례위68.4%;관찰조창구성공소점비례고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론근거병인진행구치능구현저제고혼미환자창구효과,치득차감。
Objective To explore the treatment effect of the prognosis of comatose patients according to the cause. Methods 98 coma patients were selected from November 2011 to November 2013, and they were divided into observation group and control group. The control group patients were treated in the rescue process according to the clinical symptoms, the observation group patients were treated in the treatment process according to the related causes. The treatment success was observed in the two groups after treatment. Results The observation group patients after etiology rescue:28 cases were improved in, 23 cases were cured, 9 cases were died, the successful rescue patients were 51 cases. The proportion of successful rescue was 85.0%.The control group patients according to symptoms after the rescue:17cases were improved in, 9 cases were cured, 12cases were died, the successful rescue patients were 26 cases, the proportion of successful rescue was 68.4.0%.The proportion of successful rescue in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The rescue effect according to etiology on comatose patients can significantly improve the treatment effect, the therapy is worth learning.