佛山科学技术学院学报(自然科学版)
彿山科學技術學院學報(自然科學版)
불산과학기술학원학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF FOSHAN UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2014年
5期
19-26
,共8页
旅游生态足迹%生态赤字%可持续发展%海口市
旅遊生態足跡%生態赤字%可持續髮展%海口市
여유생태족적%생태적자%가지속발전%해구시
tourism ecological footprint%ecological deficit%sustainable development%Haikou
阐述了旅游生态足迹的概念、测算依据和计算方法。结合旅游者的生态消费及结构特征,构建了旅游餐饮、住宿、交通、游览、购物和娱乐6个旅游生态足迹计算的子模型。以海口市为研究对象,计算分析了2006年海口市的旅游生态足迹和本底生态足迹。研究结果表明:2006年海口市的旅游生态足迹为865727.37 hm2,本底生态足迹为4833301.69 hm2,生态承载力为520544.85 hm2,并由此计算出海口市的人均旅游生态赤字为0.064337 hm2,总人均生态赤字为0.731890 hm2。旅游生态足迹对海口市生态足迹的贡献率是15.19%,旅游生态赤字对海口市总生态赤字的贡献率是8.79%,反映出海口市的旅游业发展给当地带来一定的生态赤字,造成了环境资源消耗、亏缺和可持续发展压力。
闡述瞭旅遊生態足跡的概唸、測算依據和計算方法。結閤旅遊者的生態消費及結構特徵,構建瞭旅遊餐飲、住宿、交通、遊覽、購物和娛樂6箇旅遊生態足跡計算的子模型。以海口市為研究對象,計算分析瞭2006年海口市的旅遊生態足跡和本底生態足跡。研究結果錶明:2006年海口市的旅遊生態足跡為865727.37 hm2,本底生態足跡為4833301.69 hm2,生態承載力為520544.85 hm2,併由此計算齣海口市的人均旅遊生態赤字為0.064337 hm2,總人均生態赤字為0.731890 hm2。旅遊生態足跡對海口市生態足跡的貢獻率是15.19%,旅遊生態赤字對海口市總生態赤字的貢獻率是8.79%,反映齣海口市的旅遊業髮展給噹地帶來一定的生態赤字,造成瞭環境資源消耗、虧缺和可持續髮展壓力。
천술료여유생태족적적개념、측산의거화계산방법。결합여유자적생태소비급결구특정,구건료여유찬음、주숙、교통、유람、구물화오악6개여유생태족적계산적자모형。이해구시위연구대상,계산분석료2006년해구시적여유생태족적화본저생태족적。연구결과표명:2006년해구시적여유생태족적위865727.37 hm2,본저생태족적위4833301.69 hm2,생태승재력위520544.85 hm2,병유차계산출해구시적인균여유생태적자위0.064337 hm2,총인균생태적자위0.731890 hm2。여유생태족적대해구시생태족적적공헌솔시15.19%,여유생태적자대해구시총생태적자적공헌솔시8.79%,반영출해구시적여유업발전급당지대래일정적생태적자,조성료배경자원소모、우결화가지속발전압력。
The concept, measurement basis and calculation method of TEF were analyzed. And combining with the ecological consumption and its structure characteristics of tourists, the model of TEF was divided into six sub-models including the model of food, accommodation, transportation, sightseeing, shopping and entertainment. Taking Haikou as an example, this paper also calculated and analyzed its TEF in 2006 by integrating synthetic method and component method. The result revealed that in 2006, the TEF was 865 727.37 hm2,the background ecological footprint was 4 833 301.69 hm2,the ecological carrying capacity was 520 544.85 hm2, and the tourism ecological deficit per capita was 0.064 337 hm2 and the total ecological deficit per capita was 0.731 890 hm2. In addition, the “contribution rate” of the TEF to the EF was 15.19% and the“contribution rate” of the tourism ecological deficit to the total ecological deficit was 8.79% in Haikou, which proved that the tourism was becoming a pressure on sustainable utilization of local environment and resources.