上海预防医学
上海預防醫學
상해예방의학
SHANGHAI JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
2014年
9期
469-472
,共4页
毛琦%王瑞平%郭晓芹%张清慧%吴毅凌
毛琦%王瑞平%郭曉芹%張清慧%吳毅凌
모기%왕서평%곽효근%장청혜%오의릉
德尔菲法%冬春季呼吸道传染病%风险评估
德爾菲法%鼕春季呼吸道傳染病%風險評估
덕이비법%동춘계호흡도전염병%풍험평고
s:Delphi method%Winter and spring of respiratory infectious diseases%Risk assessment
[目的]通过风险评估,探讨上海市松江区2013-2014年冬春季呼吸道传染病发生的可能性、危害性、人群易感性及综合风险大小,为针对性地开展传染病防控提供依据。[方法]应用德尔菲法,邀请各相关领域专家评分,最后根据既定风险评估方案,应用公式P(风险)=[L(可能性)+I(危害性)+V(人群易感性)]/3计算风险等级,综合评价传染病的风险大小。[结果]通过两轮专家风险评估,专家积极系数为1.00,三个方面的权威系数分别为0.70、0.73、0.71,协调系数分别为0.68、0.65、0.67,专家意见趋势一致。将传染病发生的可能性、危害性和易感性进行综合分析,流行性感冒的综合风险为高,肺结核、手足口病、甲型H7 N9流感、水痘和甲型H1 N1流感的综合风险较高,麻疹、猩红热、流行性腮腺炎和人高致病性禽流感的综合风险一般。[结论]松江区2013-2014年冬春季呼吸道传染病防控工作应重点关注风险高和较高的疾病。相关科室应完善相应传染病应急预案,定期开展演练,总结工作经验和教训,努力做好冬春季呼吸道传染病的防控工作。
[目的]通過風險評估,探討上海市鬆江區2013-2014年鼕春季呼吸道傳染病髮生的可能性、危害性、人群易感性及綜閤風險大小,為針對性地開展傳染病防控提供依據。[方法]應用德爾菲法,邀請各相關領域專傢評分,最後根據既定風險評估方案,應用公式P(風險)=[L(可能性)+I(危害性)+V(人群易感性)]/3計算風險等級,綜閤評價傳染病的風險大小。[結果]通過兩輪專傢風險評估,專傢積極繫數為1.00,三箇方麵的權威繫數分彆為0.70、0.73、0.71,協調繫數分彆為0.68、0.65、0.67,專傢意見趨勢一緻。將傳染病髮生的可能性、危害性和易感性進行綜閤分析,流行性感冒的綜閤風險為高,肺結覈、手足口病、甲型H7 N9流感、水痘和甲型H1 N1流感的綜閤風險較高,痳疹、猩紅熱、流行性腮腺炎和人高緻病性禽流感的綜閤風險一般。[結論]鬆江區2013-2014年鼕春季呼吸道傳染病防控工作應重點關註風險高和較高的疾病。相關科室應完善相應傳染病應急預案,定期開展縯練,總結工作經驗和教訓,努力做好鼕春季呼吸道傳染病的防控工作。
[목적]통과풍험평고,탐토상해시송강구2013-2014년동춘계호흡도전염병발생적가능성、위해성、인군역감성급종합풍험대소,위침대성지개전전염병방공제공의거。[방법]응용덕이비법,요청각상관영역전가평분,최후근거기정풍험평고방안,응용공식P(풍험)=[L(가능성)+I(위해성)+V(인군역감성)]/3계산풍험등급,종합평개전염병적풍험대소。[결과]통과량륜전가풍험평고,전가적겁계수위1.00,삼개방면적권위계수분별위0.70、0.73、0.71,협조계수분별위0.68、0.65、0.67,전가의견추세일치。장전염병발생적가능성、위해성화역감성진행종합분석,류행성감모적종합풍험위고,폐결핵、수족구병、갑형H7 N9류감、수두화갑형H1 N1류감적종합풍험교고,마진、성홍열、류행성시선염화인고치병성금류감적종합풍험일반。[결론]송강구2013-2014년동춘계호흡도전염병방공공작응중점관주풍험고화교고적질병。상관과실응완선상응전염병응급예안,정기개전연련,총결공작경험화교훈,노력주호동춘계호흡도전염병적방공공작。
By means of risk assessment, to explore the likelihood, harmfulness, pop-ulation susceptibility and comprehensive risk in relation to infectious respiratory diseases in late winter of 2013 and early spring of 2014 in Songjiang District of Shanghai , providing the basis for prevention and con-trol of infectious diseases . [ Methods] Delphi method was used and experts were invited to score for designed questions .Infectious respiratory diseases comprehensive risks were evaluated by applying the for-mula P(Risk) =[L(likelihood)+I(impact)+V(vulnerability)]/3 according to the risk evaluation plan. [ Results] After two rounds of risk evaluation by experts , the coefficient of expert activity was 1 .00 , the coefficient of authority was 0.70, 0.73 and 0.71 respectively in likelihood, harmfulness and susceptibility , and the coefficient of coordination was 0.68, 0.65 and 0.67 respectively.The viewpoints of experts tended to be consistent .Comprehensive analysis showed that the risk of influenza was high , and tuberculosis , HFMD, influenza A H7N9 avian influenza, smallpox and influenza A H1N1 avian influenza were relatively high too, while the risk of measles, scarlet fever, mumps were moderate. [Conclusion] During late winter of 2013 and early spring of 2014 in Songjiang District , close attention should be paid to the risk of in-fluenza, tuberculosis, HFMD, influenza A H7N9 avian influenza, smallpox and influenza A H1N1 avian in-fluenza .And it is important that emergency plans should be formulated or improved , drills carried out peri-odically, and experience and lessons summarized .