中国护理管理
中國護理管理
중국호리관리
CHINESE NURSING MANAGEMENT
2014年
9期
964-966,967
,共4页
护理技术操作%评估%岗位管理
護理技術操作%評估%崗位管理
호리기술조작%평고%강위관리
nursing operation techniques%assessment%post management
目的：探索一种科学、公正、量化的方法，将护理技术操作的难度和风险因素在护士的岗位管理中得到体现。方法：以全院病房的206名主管护士和护理管理者为咨询对象，对临床涉及的89项护理技术操作进行操作难度和风险评价，并根据得分将护理技术操作分级，和护士分级、病房人力资源配置等进行对应。结果：89项护理技术操作难度得分为1.77～8.20分，操作风险得分为2.03～8.34分。结论：临床护理技术操作难度和风险的评估结果，为技术操作的分级分类、岗位风险评价、病房的人力配置等提供依据，体现公平、公正的原则，有借鉴意义。
目的：探索一種科學、公正、量化的方法，將護理技術操作的難度和風險因素在護士的崗位管理中得到體現。方法：以全院病房的206名主管護士和護理管理者為咨詢對象，對臨床涉及的89項護理技術操作進行操作難度和風險評價，併根據得分將護理技術操作分級，和護士分級、病房人力資源配置等進行對應。結果：89項護理技術操作難度得分為1.77～8.20分，操作風險得分為2.03～8.34分。結論：臨床護理技術操作難度和風險的評估結果，為技術操作的分級分類、崗位風險評價、病房的人力配置等提供依據，體現公平、公正的原則，有藉鑒意義。
목적：탐색일충과학、공정、양화적방법，장호리기술조작적난도화풍험인소재호사적강위관리중득도체현。방법：이전원병방적206명주관호사화호리관리자위자순대상，대림상섭급적89항호리기술조작진행조작난도화풍험평개，병근거득분장호리기술조작분급，화호사분급、병방인력자원배치등진행대응。결과：89항호리기술조작난도득분위1.77～8.20분，조작풍험득분위2.03～8.34분。결론：림상호리기술조작난도화풍험적평고결과，위기술조작적분급분류、강위풍험평개、병방적인력배치등제공의거，체현공평、공정적원칙，유차감의의。
Objective:To search for a scientific, impartial and quantitative method, which could embody the difficulty and the risk factors of nursing technical operations in post management of nurses. Methods:A total of 206 primary nurses and administrators in the hospital were investigated. They evaluated the operation?dififculties and?risks of 89 clinical nursing operation techniques, and linked the nursing technical operation levels with nurse grading, nurse staffing, etc. Results:The operation dififculty scores of 89 nursing technical items were 1.77-8.20, and the operation risk scores were 2.03-8.34. Conclusion:Clinical nursing technical operation dififculty and risk assessment results provide a basis for categorization and classiifcation of technical operations, post risk assessment, and nurse stafifng, which embody the principle of fairness and impartiality.
