CAJ | 학술논문

目的：评价电针配合穴位注射治疗腕管综合征的临床疗效。方法将63例腕管综合征患者按入组先后根据随机数字表法分为治疗组(32例)和对照组(31例)。治疗组予电针配合穴位注射治疗，对照组予普通针刺治疗，共治疗1个疗程。经治疗后，从症状和体征上比较两组临床疗效及复发率。结果治疗组、对照组总有效率分别为93.8%和77.4%，两组总有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)；两组患者治疗后复发率比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论电针配合穴位注射治疗腕管综合征操作简单、疗效好。
목적：평개전침배합혈위주사치료완관종합정적림상료효。방법장63례완관종합정환자안입조선후근거수궤수자표법분위치료조(32례)화대조조(31례)。치료조여전침배합혈위주사치료，대조조여보통침자치료，공치료1개료정。경치료후，종증상화체정상비교량조림상료효급복발솔。결과치료조、대조조총유효솔분별위93.8%화77.4%，량조총유효솔비교차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05)；량조환자치료후복발솔비교차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05)。결론전침배합혈위주사치료완관종합정조작간단、료효호。
Objective To assess the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture plus acupuncture point injection in treating carpal tunnel syndrome. Method Sixty-three patients with carpal tunnel syndrome were allocated, using a random number table, to a treatment group (32 cases) and a control group (31 cases). The treatment group received electroacupuncture plus acupuncture point injection and the control group, conventional acupuncture. One course of treatment was given. After treatment, the clinical therapeutic effects and the recurrence rates based on the symptoms and signs were compared between the two groups. Result The total efficacy rates in the treatment and control groups were 93.8% and 77.4%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in clinical therapeutic effect between the two groups (P<0.05). There was a statistically significant posttreatment difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups of patients (P<0.05). Conclusion Electroacupuncture plus acupuncture point injection is easy to perform and has a good effect in treating carpal tunnel syndrome.