CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨比较PBL教学结合质量管理活动的方法与传统带教法在优质护理病区带教工作中的效果。方法选取2010年1月～2012年12月实习的护理专业学生80例为研究对象，随机分为A组（传统带教组）40例和B组（PLB-QC组）40例，4周后将两组学生的理论考核分数、操作考核分数、护生满意度、患者对护生满意度进行统计及比较。结果B组的理论考核分数、操作考核分数的良好率均高于A组，护生满意度也好于A组，而患者对护生满意度也高于A组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论PLB-QC教学法较传统带教法在优质护理病区临床护理带教中的效果要更好，值得推广应用。
목적：탐토비교PBL교학결합질량관리활동적방법여전통대교법재우질호리병구대교공작중적효과。방법선취2010년1월～2012년12월실습적호리전업학생80례위연구대상，수궤분위A조（전통대교조）40례화B조（PLB-QC조）40례，4주후장량조학생적이론고핵분수、조작고핵분수、호생만의도、환자대호생만의도진행통계급비교。결과B조적이론고핵분수、조작고핵분수적량호솔균고우A조，호생만의도야호우A조，이환자대호생만의도야고우A조，차이구유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론PLB-QC교학법교전통대교법재우질호리병구림상호리대교중적효과요경호，치득추엄응용。
Objective Compared the teaching effect of PBL teaching combined with QC activity method and traditional teaching method in the high quality nursing ward. Methods 80 probationer nurses were Chosen as the research object from January 2010 to December 2012,and randomly divided into group A(traditional teaching group)and group B(PLB-QC group),40 probationer nurses of each group. These probationer nurses were taught with different methods according to the different group. After four weeks,the theory examination score,operation assessment score,protection of life satisfaction and patient satisfaction with nursing students were compared between the two groups. Results The score of group B were higher than those in group A,and there were significant differences(P<0.05). Conclusion PLB-QC teaching method is better for probationer nurses teaching compared with traditional teaching in the high quality nursing ward,which is worthy of popularization and application.