上海针灸杂志
上海針灸雜誌
상해침구잡지
SHANGHAI JOURNAL OF ACUPUNCTURE AND MOXIBUSTION
2014年
10期
929-930
,共2页
椎间盘移位%腰椎间盘突出症%电针%拔罐%M-JOA评分%VAS评分
椎間盤移位%腰椎間盤突齣癥%電針%拔罐%M-JOA評分%VAS評分
추간반이위%요추간반돌출증%전침%발관%M-JOA평분%VAS평분
Intervertebral disc displacement%Lumbar intervertebral disc herniation%Electroacupuncture%Cupping therapy%M-JOA%VAS
目的:观察电针配合针罐疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法将80例腰椎间盘突出症患者按随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组40例。观察组予电针配合针罐疗法,对照组予电针配合拔罐疗法。观察治疗前后的临床疗效、M-JOA评分及VAS评分,进行比较分析。结果观察组总有效率为95.0%,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组治疗后M-JOA评分均升高(P<0.05),VAS评分均下降(P<0.05),组间治疗前后差值比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组改善更明显。结论电针配合针罐疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效显著。
目的:觀察電針配閤針罐療法治療腰椎間盤突齣癥的臨床療效。方法將80例腰椎間盤突齣癥患者按隨機數字錶法分為觀察組和對照組,每組40例。觀察組予電針配閤針罐療法,對照組予電針配閤拔罐療法。觀察治療前後的臨床療效、M-JOA評分及VAS評分,進行比較分析。結果觀察組總有效率為95.0%,與對照組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);兩組治療後M-JOA評分均升高(P<0.05),VAS評分均下降(P<0.05),組間治療前後差值比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),觀察組改善更明顯。結論電針配閤針罐療法治療腰椎間盤突齣癥療效顯著。
목적:관찰전침배합침관요법치료요추간반돌출증적림상료효。방법장80례요추간반돌출증환자안수궤수자표법분위관찰조화대조조,매조40례。관찰조여전침배합침관요법,대조조여전침배합발관요법。관찰치료전후적림상료효、M-JOA평분급VAS평분,진행비교분석。결과관찰조총유효솔위95.0%,여대조조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);량조치료후M-JOA평분균승고(P<0.05),VAS평분균하강(P<0.05),조간치료전후차치비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),관찰조개선경명현。결론전침배합침관요법치료요추간반돌출증료효현저。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture plus needle-cupping in treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (LIDH). Method Eighty patients with LIDH were divided into an observation group and a control group by random number table, 40 in each group. The observation group was intervened by electroacupuncture plus needle-cupping, while the control group was by electroacupuncture plus cupping. The clinical efficacy, Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores (M-JOA) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were observed and comparatively analyzed. Result The total effective rate was 95.0% in the observation group, significantly different from that of the control group (P<0.05); the M-JOA scores increased significantly (P<0.05) and VAS scores dropped significantly (P<0.05) in both groups, and the changes of the scores were markedly different between the two groups (P<0.05), indicating that the improvement in the observation group was more significant. Conclusion Electroacupuncture plus needle-cupping can produce a significant therapeutic efficacy in treating LIDH.