国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2013年
12期
1818-1820
,共3页
苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平%颈动脉硬化%盐酸贝那普利%血压
苯磺痠左鏇氨氯地平%頸動脈硬化%鹽痠貝那普利%血壓
분광산좌선안록지평%경동맥경화%염산패나보리%혈압
Levamlodipine besylate%Carotid atherosclerosis%Benner Pury hydrochloride%Blood pressure
目的 探讨苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平治疗颈动脉硬化的临床疗效.方法 选取我院2010年8月至2012年8月收治的颈动脉硬化患者70例,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组各35例,观察组使用苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平治疗,对照组使用盐酸贝那普利治疗,观察比较两组疗效.结果 观察组治疗前后颈内动脉IMT、颈总动脉IMT比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),对照组治疗前后颈内动脉IMT、颈总动脉IMT比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),治疗后组间比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平治疗颈动脉硬化临床疗效良好.
目的 探討苯磺痠左鏇氨氯地平治療頸動脈硬化的臨床療效.方法 選取我院2010年8月至2012年8月收治的頸動脈硬化患者70例,按照隨機數字錶法分為觀察組和對照組各35例,觀察組使用苯磺痠左鏇氨氯地平治療,對照組使用鹽痠貝那普利治療,觀察比較兩組療效.結果 觀察組治療前後頸內動脈IMT、頸總動脈IMT比較差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05),對照組治療前後頸內動脈IMT、頸總動脈IMT比較差異無統計學意義(P＞0.05),治療後組間比較差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05).結論 苯磺痠左鏇氨氯地平治療頸動脈硬化臨床療效良好.
목적 탐토분광산좌선안록지평치료경동맥경화적림상료효.방법 선취아원2010년8월지2012년8월수치적경동맥경화환자70례,안조수궤수자표법분위관찰조화대조조각35례,관찰조사용분광산좌선안록지평치료,대조조사용염산패나보리치료,관찰비교량조료효.결과 관찰조치료전후경내동맥IMT、경총동맥IMT비교차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05),대조조치료전후경내동맥IMT、경총동맥IMT비교차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05),치료후조간비교차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).결론 분광산좌선안록지평치료경동맥경화림상료효량호.
Objective To study the clinical efficacy of levamlodipine besylate in treatment of carotid atherosclerosis.Methods 70 patients with carotid atherosclerosis in our hospital from August 2010 to August 2012,according to a random number table extraction method,were divided into 2 groups,35 cases in each group.The observation group used levamlodipine treatment,control group used Benner Pury hydrochloride treatment,observation and comparison were carried out in two groups.Results In observation group,carotid inside IMT,carotid artery IMT after treatment compared with those before treatment were significantly different (P＜0.05),while in the control group,before and after treatment,the IMT and the neck total arterial IMT control had no significant difference (P＞0.05),after treatment,statistical significant difference was shown between the two groups (P＜0.05).Conclusion Levamlodipine besylate has good clinical efficacy in treatment of carotid atherosclerosis.
