CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对比火针及卤米松乳膏在亚急性、慢性湿疹治疗中的疗效。方法将114例患者分为治疗组和对照组，治疗组采用火针治疗，对照组采用卤米松乳膏治疗，两组治疗前后采用瘙痒评分、EASI评分，并进行组内及组间比较。结果治疗组与对照组瘙痒评分显效率、总有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。治疗组与对照组EASI评分显效率、总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论火针治疗对亚急性湿疹和慢性湿疹的止痒效果、起效时间、维持时间均优于卤米松治疗。
목적：대비화침급서미송유고재아급성、만성습진치료중적료효。방법장114례환자분위치료조화대조조，치료조채용화침치료，대조조채용서미송유고치료，량조치료전후채용소양평분、EASI평분，병진행조내급조간비교。결과치료조여대조조소양평분현효솔、총유효솔비교차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01)。치료조여대조조EASI평분현효솔、총유효솔비교차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05)。결론화침치료대아급성습진화만성습진적지양효과、기효시간、유지시간균우우서미송치료。
Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacies of fire-needle acupuncture and Halometasone cream in treating sub-acute and chronic eczema. Method Totally 114 patients were divided into a treatment group and a control group. The treatment group was intervened by using fire-needle acupuncture, and the control group was by Halometasone cream. Itchy score and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) were used for comparison before and after intervention. Result There were significant differences in comparing the markedly-effective rate and total effective rate between the fire-needle acupuncture group and the Halometasone control group according to the itchy score (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in comparing the markedly-effective rate and total effective rate between the two groups according to EASI (P>0.05). Conclusion Fire-needle acupuncture is superior to Halometasone cream for acute and chronic eczema in relieving itch, action time and effect-sustaining duration.