CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察电针白环俞、会阳治疗慢性前列腺炎的疗效。方法将90例患者分为针药组和中药组，每组45例；分别采用电针白环俞、会阳并口服中药治疗和单纯口服中药治疗，疗程均为4星期。用美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数表(NIH-CPSI)进行疗效评价。结果两组治疗后NIH-CPSI总积分均有下降(P＜0.05)，但针药组治疗后NIH-CPSI总积分下降更明显(P＜0.05)，且临床疗效明显优于中药组(P＜0.05)。结论电针白环俞、会阳治疗慢性前列腺炎能明显改善患者的综合症状，临床疗效优于口服中药。
목적：관찰전침백배유、회양치료만성전렬선염적료효。방법장90례환자분위침약조화중약조，매조45례；분별채용전침백배유、회양병구복중약치료화단순구복중약치료，료정균위4성기。용미국국립위생연구원만성전렬선염증상지수표(NIH-CPSI)진행료효평개。결과량조치료후NIH-CPSI총적분균유하강(P＜0.05)，단침약조치료후NIH-CPSI총적분하강경명현(P＜0.05)，차림상료효명현우우중약조(P＜0.05)。결론전침백배유、회양치료만성전렬선염능명현개선환자적종합증상，림상료효우우구복중약。
Objective To observe the therapeutic efficacy of electroacupuncture at Baihuanshu (BL30) and Huiyang (BL55) for chronic prostatitis. Method Ninety patients were divided into an acupuncture-medication group and a Chinese medication group, 45 in each group, to respectively receive electroacupuncture at Baihuanshu and Huiyang plus oral administration of Chinese medication, and single Chinese medication treatment, 4 weeks as a treatment course. The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by adopting the Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index by National Institutes of Health (NIH-CPSI). Result The general score of NIH-CPSI dropped in both groups after intervention (P<0.05), while the decrease in the acupuncture-medication group was more significant (P<0.05), and it had a significantly higher therapeutic efficacy than the Chinese medication group (P<0.05). Conclusion Electroacupuncture at Baihuanshu and Huiyang can significantly improve the symptoms of chronic prostatitis, and it’s superior to oral administration of Chinese medication in comparing the clinical efficacy.