实用癌症杂志
實用癌癥雜誌
실용암증잡지
THE PRACTICAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
2014年
4期
439-441
,共3页
曾志文%张岳农%张彩玲%林伟雄%邓靖单
曾誌文%張嶽農%張綵玲%林偉雄%鄧靖單
증지문%장악농%장채령%림위웅%산정단
食管癌%胸腹腔镜联合%支气管封堵器%疗效
食管癌%胸腹腔鏡聯閤%支氣管封堵器%療效
식관암%흉복강경연합%지기관봉도기%료효
Esophageal cancer%Thoracoscope and laparoscope%Bronchial occluder%Curative effect
目的:探讨支气管封堵器在胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术中的应用价值。方法对50例食管癌患者采用单肺通气麻醉下行胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术,按照麻醉方式的不同,分为A组( n=25例)和B组( n=25例)。 A组采用支气管阻塞器技术,B组采用双腔气管插管技术。分析2种通气方式在胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术中对患者单肺通气的影响。结果单肺通气30 min后,A组和B组动脉血氧分压( PaO2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压( PaCO2)、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)及气道峰压(Paw)等指标进行比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组和B组的插管定位时间、气道峰压增加率、咽痛声嘶发生率等指标进行比较,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05);术野暴露及肺塌陷情况满意率等指标进行比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论采用支气管封堵器行单肺通气在插管定位时间、气道峰压增加率、咽痛声嘶发生率等方面优于双腔气管插管技术,具有很好的临床应用价值。
目的:探討支氣管封堵器在胸腹腔鏡聯閤食管癌根治術中的應用價值。方法對50例食管癌患者採用單肺通氣痳醉下行胸腹腔鏡聯閤食管癌根治術,按照痳醉方式的不同,分為A組( n=25例)和B組( n=25例)。 A組採用支氣管阻塞器技術,B組採用雙腔氣管插管技術。分析2種通氣方式在胸腹腔鏡聯閤食管癌根治術中對患者單肺通氣的影響。結果單肺通氣30 min後,A組和B組動脈血氧分壓( PaO2)、動脈血二氧化碳分壓( PaCO2)、動脈血氧飽和度(SaO2)及氣道峰壓(Paw)等指標進行比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);A組和B組的插管定位時間、氣道峰壓增加率、嚥痛聲嘶髮生率等指標進行比較,差異有統計學意義( P<0.05);術野暴露及肺塌陷情況滿意率等指標進行比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論採用支氣管封堵器行單肺通氣在插管定位時間、氣道峰壓增加率、嚥痛聲嘶髮生率等方麵優于雙腔氣管插管技術,具有很好的臨床應用價值。
목적:탐토지기관봉도기재흉복강경연합식관암근치술중적응용개치。방법대50례식관암환자채용단폐통기마취하행흉복강경연합식관암근치술,안조마취방식적불동,분위A조( n=25례)화B조( n=25례)。 A조채용지기관조새기기술,B조채용쌍강기관삽관기술。분석2충통기방식재흉복강경연합식관암근치술중대환자단폐통기적영향。결과단폐통기30 min후,A조화B조동맥혈양분압( PaO2)、동맥혈이양화탄분압( PaCO2)、동맥혈양포화도(SaO2)급기도봉압(Paw)등지표진행비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);A조화B조적삽관정위시간、기도봉압증가솔、인통성시발생솔등지표진행비교,차이유통계학의의( P<0.05);술야폭로급폐탑함정황만의솔등지표진행비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론채용지기관봉도기행단폐통기재삽관정위시간、기도봉압증가솔、인통성시발생솔등방면우우쌍강기관삽관기술,구유흔호적림상응용개치。
Objective To explore the application value of bronchial occluder in thoracoscope and laparoscope combined with radical resection of esophageal cancer .Methods according to the different methods of anesthesia ,50 esophageal cancer pa-tients were divided into group A(n=25) and group B(n=25),group A adopted the bronchial obstruction technology ,and group B used double lumen endotracheal intubation technique .Effects of single lung ventilation of the 2 groups were analyzed .Results After 30-minute single lung ventilation ,PaO2 ,PaCO2 ,SaO2 and Paw of the 2 groups were compared ,there was no statistical differ-ence(P>0.05);the positioning time,rate of increased airway peak pressure ,incidence of sore throat and hoarseness of the 2 groups were compared,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);Operative field exposure and satisfaction rate of lung collapse were compared,there was no statistical difference(P>0.05).Conclusion The bronchial obstruction technology is su-perior to double lumen endotracheal intubation technique in the positioning time ,rate of increased airway peak pressure ,incidence of sore throat and hoarseness ,and it has great value in clinical application .