中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志
中國骨科臨床與基礎研究雜誌
중국골과림상여기출연구잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND BASIC ORTHO[AEDIC RESEARCH
2014年
2期
73-78
,共6页
陈凯%魏显招%翟骁%吴大江%白玉树%朱晓东%李明
陳凱%魏顯招%翟驍%吳大江%白玉樹%硃曉東%李明
진개%위현초%적효%오대강%백옥수%주효동%리명
颈部疼痛%问卷调查%量表%可重复性,结果%敏感性与特异性%残疾鉴定
頸部疼痛%問捲調查%量錶%可重複性,結果%敏感性與特異性%殘疾鑒定
경부동통%문권조사%량표%가중복성,결과%민감성여특이성%잔질감정
Neck pain%Questionnaires%Scales%Reproducibility of results%Sensitivity and specificity%Disability evaluation
目的:评估中文改编版颈部疼痛和残疾量表(SC-NPAD)的信度和效度。方法将颈部疼痛和残疾量表翻译、修订成中文版,对2008年5月至2009年3月117例第二军医大学附属长海医院骨科门诊患者进行测试,其中106例(90.1%)患者完成问卷。对量表进行因子分析,定义分量表并评估其内部一致性。第一次完成问卷5~7 d,随机选择36例患者对应发放第二份问卷,共35例进入重复性测试;同时对SF-36健康调查量表(SF-36)进行发放和回收。对SC-NPAD和SF-36量表进行相关性分析。结果因子分析结果表明,SC-NPAD 4个分量表--“疼痛”、“残疾”、“颈部特殊功能”和“情感和认知的影响”的内部一致性分别为0.935、0.952、0.955和0.910,重测信度良好(r =0.813,P=0.000)。SC-NPAD的所有分量表与SF-36及其生理功能、社会功能、物理职能、活力、躯体疼痛等5个独立域明显相关。结论SC-NPAD具有良好的信度和效度,适用于对中国颈部疼痛人群的评估。
目的:評估中文改編版頸部疼痛和殘疾量錶(SC-NPAD)的信度和效度。方法將頸部疼痛和殘疾量錶翻譯、脩訂成中文版,對2008年5月至2009年3月117例第二軍醫大學附屬長海醫院骨科門診患者進行測試,其中106例(90.1%)患者完成問捲。對量錶進行因子分析,定義分量錶併評估其內部一緻性。第一次完成問捲5~7 d,隨機選擇36例患者對應髮放第二份問捲,共35例進入重複性測試;同時對SF-36健康調查量錶(SF-36)進行髮放和迴收。對SC-NPAD和SF-36量錶進行相關性分析。結果因子分析結果錶明,SC-NPAD 4箇分量錶--“疼痛”、“殘疾”、“頸部特殊功能”和“情感和認知的影響”的內部一緻性分彆為0.935、0.952、0.955和0.910,重測信度良好(r =0.813,P=0.000)。SC-NPAD的所有分量錶與SF-36及其生理功能、社會功能、物理職能、活力、軀體疼痛等5箇獨立域明顯相關。結論SC-NPAD具有良好的信度和效度,適用于對中國頸部疼痛人群的評估。
목적:평고중문개편판경부동통화잔질량표(SC-NPAD)적신도화효도。방법장경부동통화잔질량표번역、수정성중문판,대2008년5월지2009년3월117례제이군의대학부속장해의원골과문진환자진행측시,기중106례(90.1%)환자완성문권。대량표진행인자분석,정의분량표병평고기내부일치성。제일차완성문권5~7 d,수궤선택36례환자대응발방제이빈문권,공35례진입중복성측시;동시대SF-36건강조사량표(SF-36)진행발방화회수。대SC-NPAD화SF-36량표진행상관성분석。결과인자분석결과표명,SC-NPAD 4개분량표--“동통”、“잔질”、“경부특수공능”화“정감화인지적영향”적내부일치성분별위0.935、0.952、0.955화0.910,중측신도량호(r =0.813,P=0.000)。SC-NPAD적소유분량표여SF-36급기생리공능、사회공능、물리직능、활력、구체동통등5개독립역명현상관。결론SC-NPAD구유량호적신도화효도,괄용우대중국경부동통인군적평고。
Objective To evaluate the validity and reliability of a Chinese version of neck pain and disability scale (NPAD). Methods NPAD was translated into Chinese (SC-NPAD) and tested in the outpatient service of orthopaedic department in Changhai Hospital affiliated to the Second Military Medical University. From May 2008 to March 2009, total of 117 patients were involved and 106 (90.1%) of them completed the first questionnaire. Five to seven days later, 36 cases were randomly chosen for the second questionnaire and 35 patients completed. Reliability assessment was determined by calculating internal consistency and repeatability. At the same time, SF-36 scale (SF-36) was distributed for comparison, also, correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between SC-NPAD and SF-36. Results Factor analyses demonstrated that the internal consistency of the four subscales for NPAD including "pain", "disability", "neck-specific function" and"emotional and cognitive influences" subscales, was 0.935, 0.952, 0.955 and 0.910, respectively, with a consistent test-retest reliability (r = 0.813, P = 0.000). All the subscales were significantly correlated with SF-36 and five SF-36 domains associated with the items of physical functioning, social functioning, role-physical, vitality and bodily pain. Conclusion SC-NPAD has good reliability and validity, which is fit for assessments for Chinese neck pain patients.